My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2025-08-05
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
08/05/2025
>
Agenda Packet_2025-08-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2025 5:11:00 PM
Creation date
7/30/2025 5:07:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
8/5/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
595
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Long-Term Solutions to Short-Term Rentals <br /> <br />2024-2025 Orange County Grand Jury Page 17 <br /> <br />R3: Cities that allow STRs should evaluate the benefit of ordinances facilitating Voluntary <br />Collection Agreements requiring OBAs to submit TOT directly, by June 30, 2026. (F4, F12) <br />R4: Cities that allow STRs should evaluate the benefit of collecting TOT on a monthly basis by <br />individual property, by June 30, 2026. (F7, F8) <br />R5: Cities should require STRs to include the number of days rented per month per permit to <br />facilitate short-term rental TOT desk audits by November 30, 2025. (F7, F8) <br />R6: Cities with a permit waiting list should implement strategies to remove non-revenue- <br />generating licenses to allow for fair access by December 31, 2025, and annually thereafter. (F7, <br />F10) <br />R7: Cities that allow STRs should consider allocating resources to update their short-term rental <br />TOT tracking systems by September 30, 2026. (F7, F8, F10) <br />R8: Cities that allow STRs should consider random multi-year audits to confirm TOT by June <br />30,2026, and annually thereafter. (F6, F7, F8) <br />R9: City leaders should have regular discussions with each other to share STR management <br />strategies on a biannual basis commencing no later than January 1, 2026. (F12) <br />RESPONSES <br />The following excerpts from the California Penal Code provide the requirements for public <br />agencies to respond to the Findings and Recommendations of this Grand Jury report: <br /> <br />Penal Code Section 933: <br />(c) No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public <br />agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to <br />the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters <br />under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which <br />the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the <br />presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on <br />the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or <br />agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In <br />any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these <br />comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who <br />impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with <br />the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and <br />shall remain on file in those offices. One copy shall be placed on file with the applicable grand jury <br />final report by, and in the control of the currently impaneled grand jury, where it shall be maintained <br />for a minimum of five years. <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 10 – 19 8/5/2025
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.