My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet 3.6.25
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2025
>
Packet 3.6.25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 9:28:40 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 9:26:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit 1: Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) March 3, 2025 Community Meeting <br />Summary <br />Page 2 <br />discussion format kept the meeting focused on facilitating a productive dialogue, <br />achieving consensus and thoughtful solutions, with discussion centered on two questions: <br />1) What industrial and quasi-industrial business types operating today within the <br />district can be considered compatible with residential uses? <br />2) What new proposed operational standards—for example, limits on hours of <br />operation, prohibition on truck idling—create the greatest concerns for businesses, <br />and how might they be adjusted/refined without adversely impacting residential <br />uses? <br />Attendance and Randomly-Assigned Small Groups <br />Approximately, 120 people attended the March 3, 2025, meeting comprised of residents, <br />businesses, property owners, real estate brokers, community-based organizations, and <br />staff from the offices of elected representatives. Of those in attendance, approximately, <br />58 percent represented businesses and 36 percent of the community members in <br />attendance were residents of the area. Although staff recognizes that not all attendees <br />sign in, the meeting sign in sheets indicate 94 contacts. <br /> <br />To fulfill the Planning Commission's <br />directive for open community dialogue, <br />staff designed a check-in system that <br />randomly assigned attendees to small <br />groups using color stickers to help <br />balance representation from resident <br />and businesses. At the check-in tables, <br />attendees indicated whether they were a <br />resident, business or property owner, <br />and their nametag included color <br />stickers to assign them randomly to a <br />small group. Each group included a <br />facilitator led by City staff or one of the <br />City’s planning consultants to help guide the discussion and comments to identify areas <br />of commonality, or compromise from residents and businesses regarding the proposed <br />amendments. Lastly, Spanish interpreters were present at one of the small groups to <br />facilitate mono-lingual Spanish speakers’ participation in the meeting. <br />Conclusion <br />The meeting was held in accordance with and satisfied the Planning Commission’s <br />direction provided to staff on February 24, 2025 to conduct a community meeting with <br />both business owners and residents. Areas of consensus included ensuring that the <br />ordinance addresses the most impactful industrial businesses, while areas of <br />disagreement remain in the extent to which the proposed amendments will result in land <br />use changes. Lastly, specific feedback from business owners addressing the definition <br />of craft and specialized automotive restoration service, hours of operation, and the <br /> <br />Planning Commission 1 – 8 3/6/2025 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.