Laserfiche WebLink
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO <br />GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 <br />Resolution No. 2024-XX <br />Page 3 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />not original. Although the existing metal handrail could be <br />original, it is less ornately designed than others located <br />throughout the residence and is located at the rear façade. <br />Additionally, the garage and accessory building alterations will <br />not remove historic materials or alter features and spaces that <br />characterize the property. An original, east-facing pedestrian <br />door at the garage’s rear will be moved slightly north in place <br />of an original double-hung window to accommodate the 69- <br />square-foot addition. Alterations to the accessory structure <br />are necessary for the third parking space and do not remove <br />any original features as the structure itself is not original. <br />Minor modifications the original garage are necessary for the <br />expansion, however they are rear-facing and not substantial <br />changes. The new driveway and security wall with wood gate <br />will not disrupt any of the existing historic materials, features, <br />and spaces. <br /> <br />iii. The project complies with Standard No. 3. The proposed <br />changes will not create a false sense of historical <br />development. The proposed balcony extension will add new <br />knuckle features to the existing balustrades in order to identify <br />the new extensions from the old. The new balustrades to be <br />added between the existing will have no ornamentation to <br />distinguish them from the originals. The non-compatible rear <br />stoop will be replaced with a more compatible yet minimal <br />style stoop that will not create a false sense of historical <br />development. The garage and accessory building alterations <br />will also be compatible with the historic property without <br />adding conjectural features or elements from other historic <br />properties. The new garage door will be a simple design made <br />of wood with a walnut stain. <br /> <br />iv. The project complies with Standard No. 4. The project will not <br />remove any significant features that were added over time. <br />The accessory building attached to the detached garage is not <br />original to the property and was likely added in 1944 per <br />historic building permits. However, the structure is not a <br />character defining feature of the property and has not gained <br />significance in its own right. Additionally, the rear (west) <br />stoop’s flagstone veneer is likely not original to the property <br />and is not compatibly designed with the main house. <br /> <br />v. The project complies with Standard No. 5. Distinctive <br />materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or <br />examples of craftsmanship that characterize the property will <br />be preserved. The project does not propose to remove <br />    <br />Historic Resources Commission 61 1/11/2024 <br />