My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11.7.24
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Historic Resources Commission (2009-Present)
>
2024
>
Agenda Packet 11.7.24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 3:52:39 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 3:51:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HEMA No. 2024-02 – The Dinsmore House (222 S. Cypress Avenue) <br />November 7, 2024 <br />Page 3 <br />4 <br />6 <br />3 <br />5 <br />consistent in design with historical character of the house. Selection of the new handrail <br />and other replacement materials would be subject to Planning Division staff approval. <br />Under a separate project, a horizontally sliding second-story window located above the <br />primary entrance will be restored to a wood-sash window fitting the historical dimensions <br />of the window opening at that location. Complete restoration of this particular window (i.e., <br />original size, operation, etc.) is infeasible at this time, due to the current floor plan <br />configuration along the second floor. Specifically, the window serves as ventilation to Bath <br />2, as shown on the architectural plans (Exhibit 6). Complete restoration would require a <br />complete floor plan redesign, which would be cost prohibitive to the property owner at this <br />time. <br /> <br />Analysis of the Issues <br />Secretary of the Interior’s Standards <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, will follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards <br />(“SOIS”) for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, <br />Rehabilitating, Restoring, & Reconstructing Historic Buildings (Kay D. Weeks and Anne <br />E. Grimmer, revised 2017). The proposed exterior modifications, as conditioned, would <br />be considered a rehabilitation project and as such be evaluated against ten criteria. Staff <br />has reviewed the proposed modifications in comparison to the SOIS. The following is a <br />review of the findings as they pertain to the applicable criteria: <br />1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires <br />minimal changes to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial <br />relationships. <br />As conditioned, the project complies with Standard No. 1. because it will maintain <br />the property’s historical use as a residence and will involve, at most, only a minimal <br />loss of historic fabric and no loss of character-defining historic features. The project <br />principally involves the removal of non-historical vinyl-sash windows and their <br />replacement with wood-sash windows consistent with the historical design and <br />materials of the building. Project work, such as the modification of wood window <br />surrounds to accommodate the new windows and repair and restoration of trim, <br />siding, and fascia, may result in limited changes to or loss of distinctive materials; <br />however, such work is intended to remove historical materials minimally and as a <br />last resort and would introduce new materials matched to the house’s historic <br />fabric in cases when replacements are necessary. The proposed metal back porch <br />handrail replacement involves the removal of non-historic materials that are not <br />characteristic of the house’s historical significance. The project does not propose <br />changes to any spaces or spatial relationships characteristic of the property’s <br />historical significance. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.