My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Agreement for Water System Mapping and Software Services
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 23 - Agreement for Water System Mapping and Software Services
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 8:50:12 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:37:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
23
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B – References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />References fail to substantiate Proposer’s description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br />References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br />City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer’s responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br />VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See EXHIBIT II – Sample Agreement <br />IX.SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br />B. Scoring Criteria: Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following <br />criteria: <br />CATEGORY POINTS <br />Firm/Team Experience <br />Understanding of Need <br />Relevant Project Experience <br />References <br />25 <br />30 <br />25 <br />10 <br />Fee 10 <br />TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE <br />(Before interviews – if held)100 <br />Interviews <br />The City reserves the right to conduct interviews with the highest-rated <br />firm(s). In the event the City does perform an interview process, the <br />following is the maximum number of additive points that may be applied <br />to the proposal score. Total possible score may exceed 100 points. <br />20 <br />C. Rankings: A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank <br />Proposers. Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only <br />those proposals receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.