My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 9:35:07 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AELUP guidelines and FAA requirements. <br />e. The ALUC suggests that because four buildings exceeded <br />Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces by 26 to 107 feet under Part 77 and <br />required study by the FAA, that they are hazards to air navigation or <br />pose a public safety issue. Caltrans, in their response letter, does <br />the same. This is incorrect. <br />1) All eight buildings were deemed to not be hazards. <br />2) Four of the buildings had no conditions, other than filing a <br />Form 7460-2. As stated in those determinations: <br />(a) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure <br />does not exceed obstruction standards and would not <br />be a hazard to air navigation provided the following <br />condition(s), if any, is(are) met: It is required that FAA <br />Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or <br />Alteration, be e-filed any time the project is abandoned <br />or within 5 days after the construction reaches its <br />greatest height (7460-2, Part 2). <br />3) Four of the buildings had a marking/lighting condition, in <br />addition to filing a Form 7460-2. As stated in those <br />determinations: <br />(a) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure <br />would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe <br />and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by <br />aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities. <br />Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it <br />is hereby determined that the structure would not be a <br />hazard to air navigation provided the following <br />condition(s) is(are) met: As a condition to this <br />Determination, the structure is to be marked/lighted in <br />accordance with FAA Advisory circular 7017460-1 M, <br />Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights -Chapters <br />4,5(Red),&15. Any failure or malfunction that lasts <br />more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or <br />flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, <br />should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so <br />a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) can be issued. As <br />soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the <br />same number. It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, <br />Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed <br />any time the project is abandoned or within 5 days after <br />the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, <br />Part 2). <br />Each future site -specific implementing development under the <br />Project will be required to be submitted through the City's <br />Resolution No. 2025-XXX <br />Page 14 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.