My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 9:35:07 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 NO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WITHOUT MITIGATION MEASURES <br />Explanation of the Rationale: The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of DC- <br />5, which is intended to provide urban retail, residential, mixed -use, and employment centers with <br />an intensity of up to 5.0 floor area ratio and/or 125 dwelling units per acre, and a maximum height <br />of 25 stories. The Project would be consistent with this land use designation and development <br />standards, as it would include mixed -use commercial and residential buildings ranging up to 25 <br />stories with an intensity of up to 5.0 floor area ratio and 125 dwelling units per acre. The Project <br />site is currently zoned as SD-48; however, the project's specific plan would replace SD-48 as the <br />zoning for The Village and would contain the development standards, permitted uses, and <br />administrative processes for future development at the Project site. <br />As the Project would be designed with a cohesive style that is compatible with its surrounding <br />development, the Project would support the existing visual character of the Project area. <br />Therefore, the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing <br />scenic quality, and impacts would be less than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br />pp. 5-6 — 5-7.) <br />Threshold AE-4: The Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. <br />Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant impacts to aesthetics <br />related to light and glare. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 5-7 — 5-8.) <br />Explanation of the Rationale: The Project would intensify development at the Project site both <br />horizontally and vertically, with a mix of residential, commercial, office, parking, and open space <br />uses. Thus, the Project would result in additional sources of light, such as building lighting, <br />landscape lighting, lighting along pedestrian pathways, security lighting, and parking lot lighting. <br />In addition, the Project would result in additional sources of glare due to light reflecting off parked <br />or traveling cars and building windows. However, the Project would utilize lighting that is typical <br />of the existing and surrounding developments. In addition, similar to development under the GPU, <br />the Project would be required to comply with the Title 24 Standards as amended by the Santa <br />Ana Municipal Code Chapter 8, Article II and the City's Lighting Standards (Section 5 of the City's <br />Engineering Standards and Plans). In addition, the specific plan specifies implementation of the <br />exterior and landscape lighting design requirements. Therefore, because the Project would <br />comply with applicable regulations and implement lighting design criteria, the Project would not <br />adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area and impacts would be less than significant. <br />(Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 5-7 — 5-8.) <br />Cumulative Impacts: The Project would not result in cumulative impacts concerning aesthetics. <br />Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant cumulative impacts <br />to aesthetics. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 5-5 — 5-8.) <br />Explanation of the Rationale: The Project is a mixed -use project located on an infill site. The <br />Project would include development that would be at a greater intensity and density in both height <br />and area, as well as additional sources of light, as compared to existing conditions. However, the <br />Project is not located within or near a scenic vista, would not substantially damage scenic <br />resources, and would be consistent with land use designation and development standards. <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />4-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.