My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 10 - Recieve and File the Washington Park Feasibility Study
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 10 - Recieve and File the Washington Park Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 10:48:16 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 10:28:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
10
Date
9/16/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preface <br />This is a Restricted Appraisal Report as defined in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal <br />Practice (USPAP). By prior agreement, the client has determined that a Restricted Appraisal Report is <br />appropriate in this instance. <br />This report is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule <br />2-2(b) of USPAP for a Restricted Appraisal Report. As such, it does not present discussions of the data, <br />reasoning, and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraiser's opinion of <br />value. Rather, only brief statements are presented. The supporting documentation concerning the <br />data, reasoning, and analyses is retained in the appraiser's file. The depth of discussion contained in <br />this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use of this report. <br />The subject property consists of a ±1.01-acre (±43,891 square feet) site consisting of APNs <br />405-321-08, -09, and -13, and a single-family residence on APN 405-321-12. Only the Sales <br />Comparison Approach was used to value the subject property. This approach was considered to be <br />the most likely approach a potential purchaser of the subject properties would use. The Income <br />Approach and the Cost Approach were not used, because these approaches are not what market <br />participants use to value these property types. These approaches are not pertinent in this instance. <br />Standards Rule 2-20 of USPAP specifies that a Restricted Appraisal Report address 16 specific issues. <br />The following sections of this report are presented in a manner so as to comply with the 16 <br />requirements that are specified on the previous page. <br />i. State the identity of the client, or if the client requested anonymity, state that the identity is <br />withheld at the client's request but is retained in the appraiser's workfile; <br />City of Santa Ana <br />ii. State the identity of any other intended user(s) by name; <br />None <br />iii. Clearly and conspicuously state a restriction that limits use of the report to the client and the <br />named intended user(s); <br />The use of this report is limited to the client and intended user, City of Santa Ana. There is <br />no other intended user. <br />iv. Clearly and conspicuously warn that the report may not contain supporting rationale for all of <br />the opinions and conclusions set forth in the report; <br />This report is restricted in that it does not present discussions of the data, reasoning, and <br />analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraiser's opinion of <br />value. This report cannot be thoroughly understood without this information. This <br />information has been retained in the appraiser's file. <br />V. State the intended use of the appraisal; <br />The intended use of this report is to establish the market value for the subject property as of <br />the effective date of the appraisal. This report is to be used by the City of Santa Ana for <br />internal decision -making purposes, including the possible acquisition of the subject <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Washington Square Property, Santa Ana <br />Date of Value: February 8, 2024 <br />2 <br />Page 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.