Laserfiche WebLink
density, infill development, and improvement of the job/housing balance at a lesser extent than <br /> the Project. However, impacts to land use and planning would be less than significant and similar <br /> to those of the Project. <br /> Overall, although the magnitude of impacts would be less under the Reduced Project with No <br /> Subterranean Parking Alternative in comparison to the Project, the Reduced Project with No <br /> Subterranean Parking Alternative would not eliminate the significant and unavoidable recreation <br /> impacts, the less than significant impacts of the Project, or the need for mitigation. <br /> In addition, the Reduced Project with No Subterranean Parking Alternative would not fully meet <br /> all of the Project objectives. As previously discussed, though the Reduced Project with No <br /> Subterranean Parking Alternative would transform the conventional auto-oriented shopping plaza <br /> with large surface parking areas to a mixed-use development, this alternative would not maximize <br /> the opportunities as described in the Project objectives as there would be fewer retail services <br /> and park space, no office uses, and no subsurface shared parking areas. The reduced <br /> commercial and removal of office uses would result in a net decrease of jobs from existing <br /> conditions that would not fully maximize the economic opportunities of the Project site as <br /> encouraged by the GPU. Overall, with the exception of a few Project objectives, this alternative <br /> meets most of the Project objectives, but not to the same extent as the Project. (Draft <br /> Supplemental EIR, p. 6-29.) <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 104 of 140 <br />