Laserfiche WebLink
Therefore, cumulative impacts related to aesthetics would be less than significant. (Draft <br /> Supplemental EIR, pp. 5-5 —5-8.) <br /> 4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES <br /> Threshold AF-1: The Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or <br /> Farmland of Statewide Importance to nonagricultural uses. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in no impact to agriculture and forestry <br /> resources related to the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of <br /> Statewide Importance. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 5-8.) <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: According to the California Department of Conservation's <br /> California Important Farmland Finder mapping tool, the Project site and surrounding uses are <br /> designated as "Urban and Built-Up Land." Therefore, no farmland exists on the Project site and <br /> the Project would not convert farmland to non-agricultural use. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 5-8.) <br /> Threshold AF-2: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a <br /> Williamson Act contract. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in no impact to agriculture and forestry <br /> resources related to conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. <br /> (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 5-8) <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: The Project site is zoned for Specific Development(SD-48),which <br /> does not allow for agricultural use. Additionally, according to the California Department of <br /> Conservation's California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder mapping tool, Orange County does <br /> not have any land subject to a Williamson Act Contract. Therefore, the Project would not conflict <br /> with existing zoning for agricultural use or with a Williamson Act contract. (Draft Supplemental <br /> E I R, p. 5-8.) <br /> ThresholdAF-3: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning <br /> of, forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in no impact to agriculture and forestry <br /> resources related to conflict with existing zoning for, or rezoning of, forestland, timberland, or <br /> timberland zoned Timberland Production. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 5-9.) <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: The City does not have any land designated or zoned for <br /> forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. The Project site is zoned for <br /> Specific Development(SD-48), which does not allow for forestland or timberland uses. Therefore, <br /> the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for forestland or timberland uses. (Draft <br /> Supplemental EIR, p. 5-9.) <br /> Threshold AF-4: The Project would not result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forest <br /> land to non-forest use. <br /> i <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 23 of 140 <br />