Laserfiche WebLink
public and private outdoor and recreational space to the residents. This total 13.8 acres is <br /> anticipated to meet the potential park and recreation needs of the Project residents; however, the <br /> Project residents may also use park and recreational facilities that are in the vicinity of the Project <br /> site. Such additional park visits may result in physical deterioration of recreational facilities due to <br /> the increased foot traffic and usage of park facilities. Such wear on facilities would be expected <br /> to contribute to the need for maintenance activities including, but are not limited to: replacement <br /> or fixing of picnic area tables and trash receptacles; painting and equipment maintenance of <br /> basketball,tennis,swimming, and other sports facilities; upkeep on playfield,trail, and landscaped <br /> areas; and maintenance of restroorn and parking areas. <br /> Nonetheless, the Project would meet the City's 2022 Parks Master Plan short-range goal of <br /> providing 1.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents and comply with applicable municipal code <br /> requirements and Regulatory Requirement (RR) REC-1 requiring residential development fees <br /> for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities pursuant to Santa <br /> Ana Municipal Code Section 35-108 of Chapter 35, Article 4, and Sections 35-110 and 35-111 of <br /> Chapter 35,Article 4. The Project would contribute additional public park and recreation space to <br /> the City's available public parkland and recreational spaces at a ratio of 2 acres per 1,000 <br /> residents, which is higher than the 1.2 ratio assessed for the GPU buildout, in the GPU PEIR. <br /> Moreover, the Project would provide tax revenues to the City, including contributions to the <br /> applicable community facilities district, for park maintenance that would help offset the additional <br /> deterioration occurring from the Project residents. Taken together, the Project's proposed 13.8 <br /> acres of outdoor and recreational space(comprised of 7.5 acres of publicly accessible open space <br /> and 6.3 acres of private outdoor and amenity spaces), combined with the payment of applicable <br /> fees and tax revenues serve to reduce potential impacts discussed in the GPU PEIR. Regardless, <br /> since the Project would not fully meet the GPU policy of providing 3 acres of parkland and <br /> recreation facilities per 1,000 residents, it is reasonably foreseeable that the Project would result <br /> in the increased use of existing parks and recreational facilities in a manner that results in <br /> accelerated substantial physical deterioration of the facilities. <br /> Furthermore, the City of Santa Ana is essentially fully built out and there is a lack of available <br /> vacant land to develop substantial new parks or expand existing facilities. Therefore, as identified <br /> in the GPU PEIR, there would be no feasible mitigation measures that would be able to reduce <br /> this significant impact, or the project's contribution thereto, to a less-than-significant level. As <br /> such, impacts would be significant and unavoidable, which is consistent with the findings of the <br /> GPU PEIR, <br /> Threshold R-2: The Project would include recreational facilities or require the construction <br /> or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical <br /> effect on the environment. <br /> Findings: The City finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other <br /> considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the <br /> Final Supplemental EIR. While changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, <br /> including regulatory requirement RR REC-1 (listed above), the Project to address this significant <br /> effect on the environment, no feasible mitigation measures exist to reduce impacts to a less-than- <br /> significant level. However, pursuant to PRC Section 21081(a)(3), as described in the Statement <br /> of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable based on <br /> specific overriding considerations found in Chapter 8 below. <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 89 of 140 <br />