My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-043 - Overruling the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2025
>
2025-043 - Overruling the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 10:38:51 AM
Creation date
9/25/2025 10:38:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FAA notification surface to require the Filing of FAA Form 7460-1. <br /> b. The buildings exceeding 200 feet in height in the Specific Plan area <br /> are not within the geographic area or sloping, three-dimensional 50:1 <br /> FAA precision instrument Approach Surface to JWA Runway 20R <br /> (the closest runway to the Project). <br /> C. Penetrating a Civil Airport Imaginary Surface, like the Horizontal <br /> Surface, does not in itself define a hazard. The Horizontal Surface is <br /> not unequivocally airspace reserved for air navigation, it is an <br /> imaginary surface used by the FAA to study whether obstructions are <br /> potential hazards and whether any mitigation factors can be <br /> considered (page 2-3 of FAA AC 150/5190-413, Airport land Use <br /> Compatibility Planning). These FAA studies determine whether a <br /> building poses a public safety issue or will adversely impact the <br /> continued operation of the airport and other aeronautical operations. <br /> 1) Penetrating a Civil Airport Imaginary Surface is a trigger to file <br /> a Form 7460 so that the FAA can conduct its aeronautical <br /> study. The FAA, through these studies, determines whether a <br /> building poses a public safety issue or will adversely impact <br /> the continued operation of the airport and other aeronautical <br /> operations. This is noted on Page 3-31 of the Caltrans California <br /> Airport land Use Planning Handbook: "By definition, any <br /> object that penetrates one of the imaginary surfaces is <br /> deemed an obstruction to air navigation. However, not all <br /> obstructions are necessarily hazards. The determination of <br /> whether an object would be a hazard to air navigation is made <br /> as part of an aeronautical study conducted by the FAA..." <br /> 2) As per 14 CFR Section 77.25, "The purpose of an <br /> aeronautical study is to determine whether the aeronautical <br /> effects of the specific proposal and, where appropriate, the <br /> cumulative impact resulting from the proposed construction or <br /> alteration when combined with the effects of other existing or <br /> proposed structures, would constitute a hazard to air <br /> navigation." <br /> 3) Further, in 14 CFR Section 77.29, the regulation specifies that <br /> these studies include evaluating: <br /> (1) The impact on arrival, departure, and en route <br /> procedures for aircraft operating under visual flight rules, <br /> (2) The impact on arrival, departure, and en route <br /> procedures for aircraft operating under instrument flight <br /> rules <br /> (3) The impact on existing and planned public use airports <br /> Resolution No. 2025-043 <br /> Page 12 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.