Laserfiche WebLink
to live in normal residential surroundings and use and enjoy a dwelling in a manner <br /> similar to the way a dwelling is enjoyed by the non-disabled. <br /> E. To fulfill this core purpose, the FHAA and FEHA require that the City grant an <br /> exception to its zoning ordinances if the exception is both reasonable and <br /> necessary to accommodate a person's legal disability to afford the disabled person <br /> an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. <br /> F. Several state laws require the City to treat state licensed residential care facilities <br /> serving six or fewer as a residential use, such that it is permitted in residential <br /> zoning districts (see, e.g., Health and Safety Code, §§ 1267.8, 1566.3, 1568.0831, <br /> and 11834.23). A report conducted by the 2022-2023 Grand Jury for the County <br /> of Orange found that the resulting deinstitutionalization of group living <br /> arrangements for the disabled has had a positive effect upon the disabled. ' <br /> G. The City's goal in enacting this Ordinance is to preserve the residential <br /> characteristics of residential neighborhoods, and to provide opportunities for the <br /> disabled to reside in residential zones that are enjoyed by the non-disabled. <br /> H. Over the past several years the region has seen a significant increase in the <br /> number of residential homes being utilized as alcohol and drug recovery facilities <br /> for large numbers of individuals ("sober-living homes"). <br /> I. The increase appears to be driven in part by the Substance Abuse and Crime <br /> Prevention Act of 2000 adopted by California voters, which provides that specified <br /> first-time drug and alcohol offenders are to be afforded the opportunity to receive <br /> substance abuse treatment rather than incarceration. <br /> J. The Affordable Care Act has also significantly expanded the availability of health <br /> care coverage for substance abuse treatment. <br /> K. The region has seen a sharp increase of sober-living homes, which has generated <br /> community outcry and complaints including, but not limited to overcrowding, <br /> inordinate amounts of second-hand smoke, and noise; and the clustering of sober- <br /> living facilities in close proximity to each other creating neighborhoods of sober- <br /> living homes (see Ohio House LLC v. City of Costa Mesa (9th Cir. 2024) 122 FAth <br /> 1097, 1127). <br /> L. This increase in sober-living homes has become a rising concern for cities <br /> statewide as local officials are in some cases being bombarded with complaints <br /> from residents about the proliferation of sober-living homes; conferences drawing <br /> local officials from around the state are being held discussing what to do about <br /> challenges associated with sober-living homes; and the appropriate regulation of <br /> 1"Welcome to the Neighborhood:Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?", <br /> County of Orange Grand Jury Invostigation, 2022-2023, <br /> http s:!lwww.ocgrandjury,org/sites/jury/files/2023-06/Welcomo_to_the_Neighborhood- <br /> Are_citie s_responsibly_managing_the_inte gration_of_group_homes.pdf." <br /> Ordinance No. NS-3084 <br /> Page 2 of 27 <br />