My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 5:28:21 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
10/7/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 8:23-ev-00504 Document 1-3 Filed 03/20/23 Page 10 of 76 Page ID #:76 <br /> ZOA No. 2022-03: Zoning Code Amendments and Updates <br /> January 17, 2023 <br /> Page 8 <br /> business to thrive, staff is proposing to amend Section 41-472 of the SAMC to permit <br /> retail uses in the M1 zoning district on properties that front an arterial street. <br /> Change of Use Parking Exceptions <br /> In September of 2017, the City approved Ordinance No. NS-2923 amending Chapter 41 <br /> of the SAMC to permit a change of use exception to allow the change of certain uses <br /> within an existing building up to 2,500 square feet in size without the need to provide <br /> additional parking and loading spaces. For example, a tenant space may change from <br /> retail (five (5) parking spaces per 1,000 gross square feet) to a restaurant use (eight (8) <br /> spaces per 1,000 gross square feet) without providing additional parking. The adopted <br /> ordinance allowed more flexibility and facilitated the re-tenanting of commercial, <br /> professional, and industrial centers by removing barriers to permit the change in use. <br /> Staff is proposing amending Section 41-1309.1 of the SAMC to extend that flexibility <br /> and facilitate the change of use in existing industrial centers that front arterial streets <br /> from industrial uses to retail when the retail component is equal to or less than 50 <br /> percent of the gross square footage of the tenant space. Changes in use that exceed <br /> the proposed threshold would be required to provide the minimum off-street parking <br /> required by Chapter 41 of the SAMC. <br /> Trash Enclosures <br /> In response to SS 1383, also known as the Short-lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act <br /> of 2016, and other changes to state law related to recycling and waste collection, the <br /> City updated Article II (Solid Waste Collection Regulations) of Chapter 16 (Garbage, <br /> Trash, and Weeds) of the SAMC April of 2022. Staff is proposing amending Section 41- <br /> 623 of the SAMC to update the trash bin enclosure and maintenance standards to <br /> reflect and be consistent with the new regulations in Chapter 16. <br /> Urban Lot Splits and Two-Unit Developments (SB 9) <br /> The City adopted its Urban Lot Split and Two-Unit Development standards (Sec. 41-2105 <br /> et seq.) December of 2021 in response to SB 9, also known as the California Housing <br /> Opportunity and More Efficiency (HOME) Act. The intent of the ordinance was to require <br /> all new units created through its provisions be deed restricted as affordable. Currently, <br /> Chapter 41 of the SAMC requires at least one unit created under the ordinance be deed <br /> restricted as affordable. The existing code does not explicitly state the required affordability <br /> level of the unit. Additionally, existing code lacks clarity on the total number of affordable <br /> units that are required when an urban lot split is proposed. Staff is proposing amending <br /> Section 41-2105 to clarify that any net new units created through the provisions of Division <br /> 2 or Division 3 of Article XX be made affordable at the following levels: rental products <br /> shall be made affordable to very low or low income households; for-sale products shall be <br /> made affordable to moderate income households. Lastly, staff is proposing to correct a <br /> typographical error related to front yard setbacks. The existing code states that at least a <br /> twenty-five (25) foot setback is required, when it should have read twenty (20), consistent <br /> with the Single Family (R1) zoning district standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.