My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 5:28:21 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
10/7/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 8:23-cv-00504-DOC-DFM Document 6 Filed 03/21/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #174 <br /> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT <br /> CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA <br /> NOTICE TO PARTIES: COURT POLICY ON SETTLEMENT <br /> AND USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) <br /> Counsel are required to furnish and discuss this Notice with their clients. <br /> Despite the efforts of the courts to achieve a fair, timely and just outcome in all cases, litigation <br /> has become an often lengthy and expensive process. For this reason, it is this Cow's policy to <br /> encourage parties to attempt to settle their disputes, whenever possible, through alternative <br /> dispute resolution (ADR). <br /> ADR can reduce both the time it takes to resolve a case and the costs of litigation, which can be <br /> substantial. ADR options include mediation, arbitration (binding or non-binding), neutral <br /> evaluation (NE), conciliation, inini-trial and fact-finding. ADR can be either Court-directed or <br /> privately conducted. <br /> The Court's ADR Program offers mediation through a panel of qualified and impartial attorneys <br /> who will encourage the fair, speedy and economic resolution of civil actions, Panel Mediators <br /> each have at least ten years of legal experience and are appointed by the Court. They volunteer <br /> their preparation time and the first three hours of a mediation session. This is a cost-effective <br /> way for parties to explore potential avenues of resolution. <br /> This Court requires that counsel discuss with their clients the ADR options available and <br /> instructs them to come to the initial scheduling conference prepared to discuss the parties' <br /> choice of ADR option. The ADR options available are: a settlement conference before the <br /> magistrate judge assigned to the case or the magistrate judge in Santa Barbara, the Court <br /> Mediation Panel, and private mediation. Counsel are also required to indicate the client's choice <br /> of ADR option in advance of the initial scheduling conference. See L.R. 26-1(c) and <br /> Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f). <br /> Clients and their counsel should carefully consider the anticipated expense of litigation, the <br /> uncertainties as to outcome, the time it will take to get to trial, the time an appeal will take if a <br /> decision is appealed, the burdens on a client's time, and the costs and expenses of litigation in <br /> relation to the amounts or stakes involved. <br /> Each year thousands of civil cases are filed in this district, yet typically no more than one <br /> percent go to trial. Most cases are settled between the parties, voluntarily dismissed, resolved <br /> through Court-directed or other forms of ADR, or dismissed by the Court as lacking in merit or <br /> for other reasons provided by law. <br /> For more information about the Court's ADR Program, the Mediation Panel, and the profiles of <br /> mediators, visit the Court website, www.caed.uscourts.gov, under "ADR." <br /> ADR-08(04/18) NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.