My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2025 5:05:41 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA <br /> COUNTY OF ORANGE <br /> ADR Information <br /> Introduction. <br /> Most civil disputes are resolved without filing a lawsuit, and most civil lawsuits are resolved without a trial. <br /> The courts and others offer a variety of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes to help people <br /> resolve disputes without a trial. ADR is usually less formal, less expensive, and less time-consuming than <br /> a trial. ADR can also give people more opportunity to determine when and how their dispute will be <br /> resolved. <br /> BENEFITS OF ADR. <br /> Using ADR may have a variety of benefits, depending on the type of ADR process used and the <br /> circumstances of the particular case. Some potential benefits of ADR are summarized below. <br /> Save Time. A dispute often can be settled or decided much sooner with ADR; often in a matter of <br /> months, even weeks, while bringing a lawsuit to trial can take a year or more. <br /> Save Money. When cases are resolved earlier through ADR, the parties may save some of the money <br /> they would have spent on attorney fees, court costs, experts' fees, and other litigation expenses. <br /> Increase Control Over the Process and the Outcome. In ADR, parties typically play a greater role in <br /> shaping both the process and its outcome. In most ADR processes, parties have more opportunity to tell <br /> their side of the story than they do at trial. Some ADR processes, such as mediation, allow the parties to <br /> fashion creative resolutions that are not available in a trial. Other ADR processes, such as arbitration, <br /> allow the parties to choose an expert in a particular field to decide the dispute. <br /> Preserve Relationships. ADR can be a less adversarial and hostile way to resolve a dispute. For <br /> example, an experienced mediator can help the parties effectively communicate their needs and point of <br /> view to the other side. This can be an important advantage where the parties have a relationship to <br /> preserve. <br /> Increase Satisfaction. In a trial, there is typically a winner and a loser. The loser is not likely to be <br /> happy, and even the winner may not be completely satisfied with the outcome. ADR can help the parties <br /> find win-win solutions and achieve their real goals. This, along with all of ADR's other potential <br /> advantages, inay increase the parties' overall satisfaction with both the dispute resolution process and the <br /> outcome, <br /> Improve Attorney-Client Relationships. Attorneys may also benefit from ADR by being seen as problern- <br /> solvers rather than combatants. Quick, cost-effective, and satisfying resolutions are likely to produce <br /> happier clients and thus generate repeat business from clients and referrals of their friends and associates. <br /> DISADVANTAGES OF ADR. <br /> ADR may not be suitable for every dispute. <br /> Loss of protections. If ADR is binding, the parties normally give up most court protections, including a <br /> decision by a judge or jury under formal rules of evidence and procedure, and review for legal error by an <br /> appellate court. <br /> L1200 Rev.Dec.2019 Page 2 of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.