Laserfiche WebLink
1 57. For sake of example,when RAMIREZ attempted to walk into Valentin's office just to say <br /> 2 <br /> "hi"as she had many times in the past-RAMIREZ was stopped by Valentin's assistant,Elizabeth Plotnik. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 58. Plotnik made clear to RAMIREZ that she was no longer allowed to just walk in. <br /> 5 59. Additionally, although the Tri-Tech project required Valentin's attention, the bi-weeldy <br /> 6 meetings that RAMIREZ and Valentin had been having came to an abrupt stop. <br /> 7 <br /> 60. RAMIREZ then attempted to schedule a few meetings with Valentin,only to have him cancel <br /> 8 <br /> 9 each and every one of them. <br /> 10 H. CITY Further Retaliated Against RAMIREZ for her Participation in and <br /> 11 Opposition to CITY's Conduct in Violation of the Fair Employment and <br /> 12 <br /> Housing Act. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 61. In September of2020,a Women Leaders in Law Enforcement conference was conducted on- <br /> 15 line. <br /> 16 62. A few women CITY employees decided that, due to the training being virtual,they would <br /> 17 <br /> attend the conference together in a group at one of the sergeant's houses. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 63. All the women that attended were contacted by CITY, ordered to report to the station and <br /> 20 ordered to participate in the remaining portion of the conference from there. <br /> 21 64. Needless to say,this-coupled with CITY's sexist rude reference to the event as a"pajama <br /> 22 <br /> party"- created a lot of bad feelings. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 65. Although RAMIREZ only became aware of this incident after the fact,she was asked by the <br /> 25 women to attend the remainder of the conference with them at the station. <br /> 26 66. RAMIREZ was happy to attend and did so. <br /> 27 <br /> 111 <br /> 28 <br /> 111 <br /> 9 <br /> RmniEz v,Cay of SANPA MA Cm No. <br /> COMPLAIN[' <br />