My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025 Regular & HA
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 5:28:21 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
10/7/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I that Valentin was aware of the incident and that it involved allegations of criminal <br /> 2 conduct towards juveniles by off-duty SAPID officers. <br /> 3 28. SAPOA/Serrano complained to Defendants about Valentin's and <br /> 4 Rodriguez's attempts to cover up alleged criminal conduct by officers who supported <br /> 5 Defendant Valentin pointing out that this conduct amounted to conspiring to commit a <br /> 6 criminal act. It is believed that it wasn't until June, 2021, after multiple complaints and <br /> 7 requests for investigations by the SAPOA, that Defendants initiated an investigation of <br /> 8 two of the three responding officers. The third responding officer was given a special <br /> 9 assignment on Lizardi's specialized team. In July, 2021, the Department initiated an <br /> 10 Internal Affairs investigation of one of the off-duty officers, but not Lizardi, who was the <br /> 11 ranking officer amongst the off duty personnel involved in the incident. <br /> 12 29. On information and belief, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have refused <br /> 13 to initiate an investigation of Deputy Chief Rodriguez and/or Defendant Valentin. <br /> 14 PENSION ISSUE <br /> 15 30. In October, 2020, the Defendants inquired of CalPERS as to the propriety <br /> 16 of including a premium pay, called "Confidential" received by Serrano while on paid <br /> 17 release time to serve as the SAPOA President in the calculation of his pension. It is <br /> 18 believed that the City had never inquired about this issue with any prior SAPOA <br /> 19 President. When it appeared that there might be a question regarding the inclusion of <br /> 20 the premium in the calculation of Serrano's pension, the City and SAPOA reached an <br /> 21 agreement acceptable to Ca1PERS. However, because Serrano continued to carry out <br /> 22 his duty to represent the Association and its members, activity that is clearly protected <br /> 23 under the law, Defendants failed and refused to take the necessary steps to resolve the <br /> 24 issue. <br /> 25 F'PPC COMPLAINT <br /> 26 31. In November, 2020, Sonia Carvalho, believed to be acting on her own <br /> 27 personal vendetta and without City Council approvalsent a request to the California Fair <br /> 28 Political Practices Commission seeking a finding that Serrano, as the SAPOA <br /> 8 <br /> COMPLAINT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.