My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025 Regular & HA
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 5:28:21 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
10/7/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I of speech and writing, freedom to instruct their representative, freedom to petition <br /> 2 government for redress of grievances, and to consult for the common good, re-allege <br /> 3 paragraphs 1-143, above, and further allege as follows: <br /> 4 145. While the U.S. Constitution grants citizens protections for free speech <br /> 5 under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which are enforced via 42 USC <br /> 6 §1983, the California Constitution also protects this right. Article I, Section 2 of the <br /> 7 California Constitution states that "[e]very person may freely speak, write and publish <br /> 8 his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. . . ." <br /> 9 Article I, Section 3 of the California Constitution states "[T]he people have the right to <br /> 10 instruct their representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and <br /> 11 assemble freely to consult for the common good. <br /> 12 146. Defendants, and each of them, have engaged in acts and/or omissions to <br /> 13 violate Plaintiffs right to freedom to speak, write and publish their sentiments, and/or <br /> 14 their ability to petition government for redress of grievances, assemble and to consult <br /> 15 for the common good. <br /> 16 147. The duty to obey the laws set forth in state and federal laws is a ministerial <br /> 17 duty and is not discretionary. By acting, and failing to act, as set forth above, <br /> 18 defendants have violated a ministerial duty. Moreover, the acts and/or omissions of <br /> 19 defendants, set forth above, demonstrate that defendants' failure to comply with the <br /> 20 California Constitution wherein it enjoins certain acts; therefore, defendants actions <br /> 21 were illegal as a matter of law under Government Code section 1222, which makes a <br /> 22 public officer's "willful omission to perform any duty enjoined by law" a misdemeanor. <br /> 23 148. Each and every act listed above, individually or jointly, constitutes a <br /> 24 violation of Plaintiffs' speech rights and/or the California Constitution and therefore this <br /> 25 court should render all available and proper relief to remedy the violations and to <br /> 26 prevent future violations of a like or similar nature. Plaintiffs specifically seek a "make <br /> 27 whole" remedy. <br /> 28 149. For those acts identified in the already filed Government Tort Claim, <br /> 33 <br /> COMPLAINT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.