My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 5:28:21 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
10/7/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 8:23-cv-00504 Document I Piled 03/20/23 Page 32 of 45 Page ID #:32 <br /> 1 based on damage inflicted on its own business due to unlawful discrimination and <br /> 2 violation of the rights of its patients. Second, SOS has standing to assert constitutional <br /> 3 violations of its patients' rights because: (1) SOS itself has suffered a substantial injury- <br /> 4 in-fact, in the form of the loss of the right to purchase the Main Street Property, as well <br /> 5 as the loss of significant funds spent in developing the Property and extending the PSA, <br /> 6 thereby giving SOS a sufficiently concrete interest in the outcome of the issue in <br /> 7 dispute, (2) SOS has a close enough relationship to its patients to justify standing, and <br /> 8 (3) the patients themselves are unable and unlikely to assert claims against the City <br /> 9 relating to its zoning ordinances because (a) most lack sufficient financial resources to <br /> 10 fund litigation, (b) many of the potential patients that could be served in the P District <br /> 11 are as yet unknown, and (c) the Ordinances have an indirect effect on their rights and the <br /> 12 existing ordinances are likely unknown to them. <br /> 13 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br /> 14 (Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution-- <br /> 15 Substantive Due Process, Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 2201) <br /> 16 128. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein by reference each and every <br /> 17 allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 127, inclusive, as set forth above. <br /> 18 129. The Urgency Ordinance, the Permanent Ordinance, and Municipal Code § <br /> 19 41-313.5(p), on their face and as applied, impose the discriminatory CUP Requirement <br /> 20 on Medical Offices operated by Non-Profit Entities in the P District, while not requiring <br /> 21 a CUP for Medical Offices that are operated by For-Profit Entities in that same District. <br /> 22 130. Based on SOS's preliminary estimate, there appear to be at least 42 For- <br /> 23 Profit Entities that are currently operating Medical Offices in the P District. <br /> 24 131. The salient characteristic of Non-Profit Entities that is not shared with For- <br /> 32 <br /> Complaint of Share Our Selves <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.