My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 10
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
10/07/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2025 9:21:45 AM
Creation date
10/1/2025 10:06:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Becerra, Alexis <br /> From: Nathaniel Greensides < <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 11:20 AM <br /> To: eComment <br /> Subject: Oct 7 2025 item 10 <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br /> Dear City Council, <br /> Having been involved with various local rent control campaigns since 2018, 1 write in support of the item. <br /> The passage of Measure CC in 2024 was a monumental moment for our city, with 43,134 residents voting to establish <br /> permanent rent stabilization and just-cause protections.This rental registry is a vital tool for carrying out the will of <br /> those voters and ensuring the law is administered and enforced effectively. <br /> I would like to address some of the points of opposition: <br /> A rental registry makes administration and enforcement of these rights and protections for our residents easier.There <br /> has been misinformation circulating that the rental registry would be funded by general funds. I want to clarify that the <br /> registry is designed to be self-sufficient,funded entirely by a fee assessed on the rental units subject to the <br /> ordinance.The opposition to this item appears to be heavily influenced by a specific private online Facebook group <br /> controlled by a current city commissioner. This raises concerns, particularly since this group has been known to censor <br /> the voices of current Santa Ana residents and includes a large number of non-residents.This makes the opposition's <br /> claims less representative of our community and more about an agenda that doesn't reflect the needs of Santa Ana's <br /> tenants and landlords. <br /> The one opposing ecomment submitted thus far to the item complains about requiring exemption forms and I think it is <br /> unfounded.The exemption forms are a standard and necessary administrative step that ultimately benefits landlords by <br /> clarifying which units are exempt from fees and regulations.This is similar to our city's business licensing,where <br /> submitting documentation can reduce fees and ensure regulatory compliance. <br /> Finally,the software vendor being considered seems to have extensive experience in this area. Not only will their <br /> solution streamline administration for city staff, but it will also ensure that fee collection and communication with <br /> tenants and landlords are convenient and compliant with our local laws. Here is the webpage that shows some of the <br /> features that might apply to our local rental registry if you all vote in favor of the item: https://www.tolemi.com/rental- <br /> registration. <br /> I ask that you vote in favor of this item. To do otherwise would be to go against the clear will of the voters who passed <br /> Measure CC. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nathaniel Greensides <br /> Ward 5 Resident <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.