My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2025-11-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
11/04/2025 Regular & HA
>
Agenda Packet_2025-11-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2025 12:26:26 PM
Creation date
10/29/2025 12:21:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
11/4/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
745
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />• City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the <br />required attachments. <br />IX. REFERENCES <br />Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services <br />similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B – References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br /> <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if: <br />• References fail to substantiate Proposer’s description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br /> <br />• References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br /> <br />• City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer’s responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br /> <br />X. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See Exhibit II – Sample Agreement <br /> <br />XI. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br /> <br /> <br />B. Scoring Criteria: Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following <br />criteria: <br />CATEGORY POINTS <br />Background, Qualifications & Experience <br />o The technical qualifications and experience of the organization are adequately <br />described as they relate to the Scope of Work (SOW). <br />o The proposal identifies specific projects completed within the past five (5) years that <br />demonstrate competency of the tasks outlines in the SOW. <br />o The ability to meet the needs and concerns of the City is adequately demonstrated. <br /> <br />25 <br />Key Personnel / Proposed Staffing <br />• Proposer demonstrates experience providing type of service required or <br />experience providing similar services <br />• Proposer demonstrates they have the necessary resources, knowledge, <br />skills, experience, and any required licenses / certifications to provide the <br />required services <br />20 <br />City of Santa Ana RFP 25-116 Page 9 of 60 <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 17 – 43 11/4/2025
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.