My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Public Hearing Public Works Water Quality Report and Public Health Goals
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
11/04/2025
>
Item 23 - Public Hearing Public Works Water Quality Report and Public Health Goals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2025 1:50:02 PM
Creation date
10/29/2025 1:31:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
23
Date
11/4/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Uranium – OEHHA has determined the health risk associated with the PHG is 1 excess case of <br />cancer in a million people and the risk associated with the MCL is 5 excess cases of cancer in <br />100,000 people exposed over a 70-year lifetime. <br />5.0 Identification of Risk Categories <br />Section 116470(b)(3) of the Health and Safety Code requires identification of the category of <br />risk to public health associated with exposure to the contaminant in drinking water, including a <br />brief, plainly worded description of those terms. The risk categories and definitions for the <br />contaminants identified above are shown on the accompanying table. <br />6.0 Description of Best Available Technology <br />Section 116470(b)(4) of the Health and Safety Code requires a description of the BAT, if any is <br />available on a commercial basis, to remove or reduce the concentrations of the contaminants <br />identified above. The BATs are shown on the accompanying table. <br />7.0 Costs of Using Best Available Technologies and Intended Actions <br />Section 116470(b)(5) of the Health and Safety Code requires an estimate of the aggregate cost <br />and cost per customer of utilizing the BATs identified to reduce the concentration of a <br />contaminant to a level at or below the PHG or MCLG. In addition, Section 116470(b)(6) <br />requires a brief description of any actions the water purveyor intends to take to reduce the <br />concentration of the contaminant and the basis for that decision. <br />Arsenic – The BATs for removal of arsenic in water for large water systems are: activated <br />alumina, coagulation/filtration, electrodialysis, ion exchange, lime softening, oxidation/filtration, <br />and reverse osmosis. Arsenic was detected above the PHG in the local groundwater (Well 37). <br />The City is in compliance with the MCL for arsenic. The estimated cost to reduce arsenic levels <br />in the groundwater to below the PHG of 0.004 microgram per liter (µg/l) using ion exchange was <br />calculated. Because the DDW detection limit for purposes of reporting (DLR) for arsenic is 2 <br />µg/l, treating arsenic to below the PHG level means treating arsenic to below the DLR of 2 µg/l. <br />There are numerous factors that may influence the actual cost of reducing arsenic levels to the <br />City of Santa Ana 5 2025 PHGs Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.