Laserfiche WebLink
H. It is the intent of City Council to sell the Property to a contiguous land owner of the <br />Property, otherwise the Property shall not be considered "exempt" under <br />54221(f)(1)(E). <br />Notice is not required per Government Code section 54221(f)(2) because the <br />Property is (1) not within a Coastal Zone, (ii) not adjacent to a historical unit of the <br />State Parks System, (iii) not listed on, or determined by the State Office of Historic <br />Preservation to be eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places, and (iv) not <br />within the Lake Tahoe region as defined in Government Code section 66905.5. <br />Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the Property is no longer <br />necessary for the City's use and is therefore exempt surplus land, pursuant to Government <br />Code sections 54221(f)(1)(B) and 54221(f)(1)(E) based on the true and correct written <br />findings found in Section 1, incorporated herein by this reference. <br />Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any and <br />all documents necessary to dispose of the Property in accordance with this Resolution, if it is <br />determined to be in the best interests of the City. <br />Section 4. The City will notify the Department of Housing and Community <br />Development no less than thirty (30) days prior to the disposing of any exempt surplus land. <br />Section 5. This resolution has been reviewed with respect to the applicability of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, §§21000 et seq.; 14 CCR §§ <br />15000 et seq.) ("CEQA"). City staff has determined that the designation of the Property as <br />exempt surplus land does not qualify as a "project" as defined by the CEQA Guidelines <br />Section 15378. First, Section 15378 defines a project as an activity that "has a potential for <br />resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment." (State CEQA Guidelines, <br />§15378(a).) Here, the action is to declare the Property as exempt surplus land, which will not <br />result in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable <br />indirect physical change to the environment. Accordingly, the action is not a "project" subject <br />to CEQA. (State CEQA Guidelines, §15060(c).) Second, Section 15378 explicitly excludes <br />from its definition of "project" the following: "organizational or administrative activities of <br />governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment." <br />(State CEQA Guidelines, §15378(b)(5).) The action to designate the Property as exempt <br />surplus land constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a <br />physical change in the environment, and is therefore is not subject to CEQA. This action does <br />not constitute a binding commitment to any particular use of the Property, nor is any <br />development associated with this action. If and when the Property is sold to a purchaser and <br />that purchaser proposes a use for the Property that requires a discretionary permit and CEQA <br />review, that future use of the Property will be analyzed at the appropriate time in accordance <br />with CEQA. <br />Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the <br />City Council and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. <br />Resolution No. 2025-054 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />