My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/03/2026 Regular
>
Correspondence - Item 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 8:26:12 AM
Creation date
1/29/2026 12:10:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Several recommendations to develop a fund for arts infrastructure include: <br /> • Voluntary millage fee promoted via utility bills <br /> • Dedicating a percentage of business taxes and fees <br /> • Dedicating Hotel/Motel tax dollars <br /> • Applying for grants such as: <br /> • ArtPlace America Grant (up to $500,000) <br /> • National Endowment for the Arts Our Town Grant (up to $250,000) <br /> • California Arts Council Creative California Communities Grant (up to $70,000) <br /> • If the City decides to proceed with a live-work venue, a combination of a bond <br /> issue, tax increment and private fund-raising could augment the resources that <br /> the nonprofit developer would be raising. <br /> Over the longer term, the City should seek to institute a dedicated revenue stream to <br /> fund its arts and cultural development programs. Examples include: <br /> • Many cities, including many in California, allocate a portion of the Transit <br /> Occupancy <br /> • (Hotel) Tax for the arts. <br /> • More than 600 municipalities allocate between 1% and 2% of CIP project budgets <br /> for public art. <br /> • Some cities extend the percent for art requirement to new private commercial, <br /> industrial and residential development. <br /> • Some cities broaden the definition of public art in their percent for art policy to <br /> include arts programming in public spaces. <br /> • Some cities (Denver, St. Louis, Salt Lake City, Pittsburgh) have created arts and <br /> cultural funding districts that dedicate sales or property tax to fund the arts. It <br /> should be noted that such dedication of taxes to specific purposes requires a <br /> 2/3rds vote of the citizens under California's Proposition 13. <br /> • Sometimes Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) collect funds to support funding <br /> for the arts. <br /> • There are many cities that have created Friends of the Arts organizations or <br /> foundations to generate private funding for the arts. <br /> • For vacant buildings, cities have established fees/fines for buildings that remain <br /> vacant for extended periods of time. This program has proved very successful in <br /> cities such as San Antonio. <br /> Recommendation 8.1: Develop a Public Art Program. <br /> Initiative 8.1.1: Adopt a two percent for art ordinance or policy for all City CIP <br /> projects. <br /> It is recommended the program utilize professional art selection panels (see <br /> Recommendation 2.1 regarding peer panels). The intent of the program is to select <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.