Item 14 - Award of a Construction Contract for Bristol St and Memory Lane Intersection

Home Browse Search

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM - Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-E883 X-3 The removal of underground storage tanks will be in accordance with all applicable regulations. For any service stations that will be partially acquired or displaced, the City will request that the owners remove the underground gasoline tanks prior to property acquisition. If the owners do not remove the underground tanks, the City will include the following statement in the right-of-way agreement: "It is understood the property being acquired in this transaction may contain hazardous waste which must be removed or otherwise treated under state or federal Law to protect the public health. If hazardous waste is found to exist on the property, the State may exercise its right to bring an action, if necessary, to recover clean-up costs from the grantors or any others who are ultimately determined to have responsibility for the hazardous waste condition of the property" Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c] Emd hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substanees, or "W"e n*hbt one -quarter mile of an exftfitg or proposed school? The schools closest to the Project site are Santiago Elementary School (located approximately 0.46 mile south at 2212 N. Baker Street, Santa Ana) and Riverdale EIementary School (located approximately 0.60 mile west at 13222 Lewis Street, Garden Grove). Thus, no schools are located within one -quarter mile of the Project site and impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. dj Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and as a result would it create a sign (rcaitt hazard to the public or the environment? The Project site includes a former service station where gasoline was reported to have contaminated the soil; the site completed site remediation through appropriate state and local agency standards as required. To that end, the RWQCB issued a case closure letter dated October 22,. 2001 stating that no further action was required for the site. As discussed in Response 3.8(b), compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 FEISIEIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEISIEIR Mitigation Measures X-1 through X-3. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e} For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted witftin twn miles of a public airport or public use airpor4 would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The Project site is not within an airport Iand use plan. The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles southeast of the Project site. The proposed Project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks associated with the Project. Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEISIEIR. Certified 1990 FEISIETR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEISIEIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Final I December 2017 3-15 Environmental Consequences