My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 16 - Ordinance Prohibiting Anti-Competitive Automated Rent Price-Fixing
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/17/2026 Regular
>
Item 16 - Ordinance Prohibiting Anti-Competitive Automated Rent Price-Fixing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2026 7:54:18 AM
Creation date
2/11/2026 7:53:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
16
Date
2/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 1 <br />Ordinance No. NS-XXXX <br />Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br />“Tenant” means a tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee, or any other natural <br />person entitled to Lease any Residential Real Property. <br /> <br />Section 8-3702 – Use and Sale of Algorithmic Devices Prohibited <br /> <br />(a) It is unlawful for a person to sell, license, or otherwise provide an Algorithmic <br />Device to a Landlord. <br /> <br />(b) It is unlawful for a Landlord to use an Algorithmic Device to set rental rates or <br />occupancy levels for Residential Real Property. For each month a violation of Section 8- <br />3702(b) exists or continues, and for each Residential Rental Property a Landlord uses an <br />Algorithmic Device, it shall constitute a separate and distinct violation. <br /> <br /> <br />Section 8-3703 – Remedies <br /> <br />(a) A Tenant may seek injunctive relief, damages, or civil penalties of up to $1,000 <br />per violation of this Article, in a civil action against a Landlord. In an action brought under <br />this Article, a prevailing Tenant shall recover costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. A <br />prevailing Tenant includes a Tenant granted an order for injunctive relief. A Lease <br />provision that limits a Tenant from recovering attorney’s fees shall not be enforceable <br />against a Tenant’s claim for attorney’s fees that arise under this Article. <br /> <br />(b) The remedies under Section 8-3703 are cumulative and are in addition to any <br />other remedies in this Article or at law, statute, or ordinance. <br /> <br />Section 4. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject <br />to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to sections 15060(c)(2) and <br />15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or <br />reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment, as there is no <br />possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a “project” as <br />defined in section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed <br />Ordinance falls within the “common sense” CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA <br />Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty <br />that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the <br />environment.” <br /> <br />Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this <br />ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any <br />court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining <br />portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that <br />it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, <br />phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, <br />subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or <br />unconstitutional. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.