My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-02-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/17/2026 Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2026-02-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2026 8:28:38 AM
Creation date
2/11/2026 8:25:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
2/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
536
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 <br />MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST <br />Final I December 2017 2 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br />New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR <br />Project Changes <br />No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or <br />Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR <br />Impact After 1990 Impact Required? <br />Mitigabon <br />1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X <br />scenic vista? YES NO <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock X YES NOoutcroppings, and historic buildings within <br />a state scenic highway? <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality ofthe site and its X YES NO <br />surroundings? <br />d) Create a new source of substantial light <br />or glare, which would adversely affect day X YES NO <br />or nighttime views in the area? <br />2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique <br />Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide <br />Importance (Farmland), as shown on the <br />maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland X YES NO <br />Mapping and Monitoring Program ofthe <br />California Resources Agency, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for <br />agricultural use, or a Williamson Act X YES NO <br />contract? <br />c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or <br />cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined <br />in Public Resources Code section <br />12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public X YES NO <br />Resources Code section 4526), or <br />timberland zoned Timberland Production <br />as defined by Government Code section <br />51104(8))? <br />d) Result in the loss of forest land or <br />conversionofforestlandtonon-forest X YES NO <br />use? <br />e) Involve other changes in the existing <br />environment which, due to their location or <br />nature, could result in conversion of <br />X YES NO <br />Farmland, to non-agricultural use or <br />conversion of forest land to non -forest <br />use? <br />3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation X YES NO <br />ofthe applicable air quality plan? <br />b) Violate any air quality standard or <br />contribute substantially to an existing or X YES NO <br />projected air quality violation? <br />Final I December 2017 2 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 14 – 84 2/17/2026
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.