My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-02-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/17/2026 Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2026-02-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2026 8:28:38 AM
Creation date
2/11/2026 8:25:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
2/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
536
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 <br />MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST <br />Final I December 2017 10 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br />New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR <br />Project Changes <br />No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or <br />Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR <br />Impact After 1990 Impact Required? <br />Mitigabon <br />b) Does the project include recreational <br />facilities or require the construction or <br />expansion of recreational facilities that X YES NO <br />might have an adverse physical effect on <br />the environment? <br />16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with an applicable plan, <br />ordinance or policy establishing measures <br />of effectiveness for the performance of the <br />circulation system, taking into account all <br />modes of transportation including mass <br />transit and non -motorized travel and X YES NO <br />relevant components ofthe circulation <br />system, including but not limited to <br />intersections, streets, highways and <br />freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, <br />and mass transit? <br />b) Conflict with an applicable congestion <br />management program, including, but not <br />limited to level of service standards and <br />travel demand measures, or other X YES NO <br />standards established by the county <br />congestion management agency for <br />designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, <br />including either an increase in traffic levels X YES NO <br />or a change in location that results in <br />substantial safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a <br />design feature (e. g, sharp curves or X YES NO <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible <br />uses (e. g, farm equipment)? <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency X YES NO <br />access? <br />f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or <br />programs regarding public transit, bicycle, <br />or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise X YES NO <br />decrease the performance or safety of <br />such facilities? <br />Final I December 2017 10 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 14 – 92 2/17/2026
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.