My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-02-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/17/2026 Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2026-02-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2026 8:28:38 AM
Creation date
2/11/2026 8:25:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
2/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
536
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Santa Ana | First Street Multimodal Corridor <br />Technical Memorandum <br /> <br />41 <br />Workshop 2 Input The in-person workshop was held over two consecutive days (September 17 and 18 from 5:00 to 7:00PM) as an open house style with Spanish and Vietnamese interpreters on hand to assist participants. A series of stations were set up to help participants navigate the eight options being presented (refer to Photo 7). The stations included “Existing Conditions”, “Design Options”, “Aerial Maps”, “Curb Space and Bus Stops”, and “Railroad Tracks Configuration” as well as a welcome table and a family table. Workshop participants were encouraged to provide feedback on potential design options for the corridor, connect with the Project Team, suggest improvements to access and travel options, and learn more about the next stages of the project. A total of 69 attendees signed in at the workshop over the course of the two days and 30 comment cards were collected. Participants were encouraged to participate in a preference activity where they placed pom-pom balls in containers that represent the options that they liked. While three pom-pom balls were provided to each participant, additional balls were provided if requested. The preference activity (pom-pom balls) revealed a strong preference for bus lanes. Figures 21 and 22 below break down the results of the preference survey by lane configuration and by pedestrian and bicycle zone configuration. <br />Figure 21. Percent of Responses Related to Number of Lanes by Option <br /> <br />Figure 22. Percent of Responses Related to Pedestrian and Bicycle Zone <br />Configuration <br /> <br /> <br />15% <br />12% <br />24% <br />36% <br />13%Six Lanes <br />Four Lanes <br />Five Lanes <br />Four + Bus <br />Five + Bus <br />15% <br />5% <br />63% <br />11% <br />6%Multi Use Trail <br />Multi Use Trail + Bike Lanes <br />Sidewalk + Directional Bikeway <br />Sidewalk + Bi-Directional Bikeway <br />Shared Bus - Bike Lane <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 19 – 105 2/17/2026
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.