My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 8:13:49 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 9:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
22
Date
3/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANTA ANA REZONE PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />survey were for the most part relatively flat and clear with approximately 5 percent of native soil <br />visibility. The project site is heavily disturbed by modern materials and is utilized as a parking lot. The <br />eastern boundary of the project site was unable to be thoroughly surveyed as it contained a utility <br />building that was fenced off and locked which can be seen in Photographs 1 and 4 (Appendix C), <br />respectively. Furthermore, a fence divides a portion of the southern boundary from the rest of the <br />proposed project which can be seen in Photographs 3 and 10 (Appendix C). <br />As the project site is heavily covered by manufactured materials such as trailers in the northwest and <br />by construction equipment to the east and south and is made up of mainly compacted dirt and gravel. <br />Conducting traditional 15-meter transects to survey was forgone in favor of photography and utilizing <br />corner overview shots to display the conditions of the project site. During the survey, Mr. Ochoa <br />examined all areas of the exposed ground surface for pre -contact artifacts (e.g., fire -affected rock, <br />milling tools, flaked stone tools, toolmaking debris, ceramics), soil discoloration and depressions that <br />might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, faunal and human osteological remains, and <br />features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., postholes, standing exterior <br />walls, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., glass, metal, ceramics). All areas of the project site were <br />closely examined for culturally modified soils or other indicators of potential historic or pre -contact <br />resources. No historic or pre -contact cultural resources or raw materials were observed. <br />In addition to the pedestrian survey, the potential for unidentified cultural resources in the vicinity was <br />reviewed against geologic and topographic geographic information system data for the general area <br />and information from other nearby projects. The proposed project was evaluated against a set of <br />criteria identified by a geoarchaeological overview of the Central Valley that was prepared for the <br />California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Districts 6 and 9.27 This study mapped the <br />"archaeological sensitivity," or potential to support the presence of buried pre -contact archaeological <br />deposits, throughout the San Francisco Bay Area based on geology and environmental parameters <br />including distance to water and landform slope. The methodology used in the study is applicable to <br />other parts of California and concluded that sites consisting of flat, Holocene -era deposits in close <br />proximity to water resources had a moderate to high probability of containing subsurface <br />archaeological deposits when compared to earlier Pleistocene deposits situated on slopes or further <br />away from drainages, lakes, and rivers. <br />According to the geologic map of the Northern Santa Ana Mountains, California,28 the project site is <br />situated on younger alluvium deposits (Qya). Applying the criteria set forth above, the terrain of the <br />project site is flat and completely hardscaped, and there is no water source in proximity to the <br />proposed project. Based on the negative SLF search results, pedestrian survey, and the absence of <br />pre -contact resources within the project site or the 0.5-mile search radius, the potential for <br />unanticipated buried cultural resources to be impacted by project construction is low. <br />27 Meyer, J., D. Craig Young, and Jeffrey S. Rosenthal. 2010. Volume I: A Geoarchaeological Overview and Assessment of <br />Caltrans District 6 and 9, Cultural Resources Inventory of Caltrans District 6/9 Rural Conventional Highways. Submitted <br />to Central California Department of Transportation, District 6. <br />8 United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey. 1929. Geologic Map of the Northern Santa Ana Mountains, <br />California. <br />FCS 43 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PubiicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client(PN-JN)/D327/03270D47/ISMND/0327D047 Santa Ana Rezone Project ISMND.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.