My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 8:13:49 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 9:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
22
Date
3/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANTA ANA REZONE PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious <br />surfaces, in a manner which would: <br />(i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site; <br />Less than significant impact. Project construction activities such as demolition, grading, paving, <br />and site improvements may result in loose sediment, which can be transported by surface water or <br />wind into nearby storm drains and waterways. <br />The proposed project would not alter the course of a stream or river as the Santa Ana River is located <br />approximately 4 miles west of the project area. The proposed project would involve construction in an <br />area that is currently covered by a gravel parking lot. As described above, the project site is currently <br />used for parking and is heavily compacted due to daily vehicular use. The proposed project would not <br />substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site in a manner that would result in substantial <br />erosion or siltation on- or off -site. As such, impacts related to the alteration of existing drainage <br />patterns in the area that could result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site would be less <br />than significant. <br />(ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which <br />would result in flooding on- or off -site; <br />Less than significant impact. Project construction activities such as demolition, grading, paving, <br />and site improvements may result in loose sediment that can be picked up by surface water or wind <br />into nearby storm drains and into waterways. The proposed project would not alter the existing <br />drainage pattern of the site and would not alter the path of a stream or river, as explained above. As <br />such, impacts related to the alteration of existing drainage patterns in the area that could result in <br />flooding on- or off -site would be less than significant. <br />(iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing <br />or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional <br />sources of polluted runoff; or <br />Less than significant impact. The proposed project would be served by the City's stormwater <br />drainage system. Construction activities such as demolition, grading, and paving could introduce <br />additional pollutants and sediment into water runoff and flow into nearby storm drains. Continuous <br />use and operation of the site would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the <br />capacity of existing stormwater drains on the project site with implementation of these BMPs. <br />Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. <br />(iv) impede or redirect flood flows? <br />No impact. The project site is not located within a floodplain. The proposed project would not add <br />additional impervious surfaces or alter the course of a stream or river. Therefore, there are no impacts <br />related to impeding or redirecting flood flow would occur. <br />FCS 69 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PubiicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client(PN-JN)/D327/03270D47/ISMND/0327D047 Santa Ana Rezone Project ISMND.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.