My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Item 22 - Public Hearing Ordinance Second Reading - General Plan Amendment, Zoo Overflow Parking Rezone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 8:13:49 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 9:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
22
Date
3/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANTA ANA REZONE PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />The nearest noise -sensitive receptor is the single-family residential land use located south of the <br />project site. The nearest fagade of the single-family land use is located approximately 160 feet south <br />of the nearest proposed parking areas. At this distance, with minimal shielding from an existing <br />concrete wall, noise levels associated with daily parking lot activities would attenuate to <br />approximately 47 dBA Leq. The calculation spreadsheet with detailed modeling assumptions is <br />provided in Appendix D. <br />Noise levels resulting from parking lot activities at the proposed project site would not exceed the <br />City's exterior noise limit of 55 dBA Leq hourly average during daytime hours, and a noise limit of 50 <br />dBA Leq hourly average during nighttime hours, for receiving residential land uses. Therefore, <br />operational noise levels due to parking lot activities would not result in a substantial permanent <br />increase in excess of any of the noise performance thresholds and would represent a less than <br />significant impact. <br />Operational/Mobile Source Noise Impacts <br />Less than significant impact. A significant impact would occur if project -generated traffic would <br />result in a substantial increase in ambient noise levels compared with those that would exist without <br />the proposed project. Typically, a doubling of the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) hourly volumes on a <br />roadway segment is required in order to result in an increase of 3 dBA in traffic noise levels, which, as <br />discussed in the characteristics of noise discussion above, is the lowest change that can be <br />perceptible to the human ear in outdoor environments. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, a <br />doubling of the existing ADT volumes would result in a substantial permanent increase in traffic noise <br />levels. <br />Based on the traffic analysis prepared for the proposed project by Urban Crossroads,62 the proposed <br />project is anticipated to generate an addition of 876 trips per day with 37 AM peak -hour trips and 63 <br />PM peak -hour trips. Because of the high level of residential development to the south of the project <br />site, the existing ADT on this roadway segment would be substantially higher than the trips generated <br />by this project. As such, these new net trips would not double existing average daily trips; therefore, <br />the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels <br />from project -generated traffic trips and mobile source operational noise impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? <br />Less than significant impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project would <br />generate groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels in excess of established standards. The <br />City has not established requirements regarding construction vibration impacts; therefore, for the <br />purposes of this analysis, the FTA guidelines for vibration impacts are used to determine potential <br />significant construction and operational -related vibration impacts.63 <br />62 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 2025. Santa Ana Rezone Trip Generation Assessment. July 23 <br />63 Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September. <br />82 FCS <br />Https://adecinnovaticns.sharepoint.com/sites/PubiicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client(PN-JN)/0327/03270047/ISMND/03270047 Santa Ana Rezone Project ISMND.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.