My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda_Packet_2026-03-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Agenda_Packet_2026-03-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2026 10:59:45 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 9:17:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/17/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 2026 election. The survey followed a mixed -method design that employed multiple <br />recruiting methods (email, text, and telephone) and multiple data collection methods (telephone <br />and online). Administered in English, Spanish and Vietnamese between December 10 and <br />December 16, 2025, the average interview lasted 16 minutes. <br />® _—ALNIZATICThis report is designed to meet the needs of readers who <br />prefer a summary of the findings as well as those who are interested in the details of the results. <br />For those who seek an overview of the findings, the section titled Key Findings is for you. It pro- <br />vides a summary of the most important factual findings of the survey in a Question & Answer for- <br />mat. For the interested reader, this section is followed by a more detailed question -by -question <br />discussion of the results from the survey by topic area (see Table of Contents), as well as a <br />description of the methodology employed for collecting and analyzing the data. And, for the <br />truly ambitious reader, the questionnaire used for the interviews is contained at the back of this <br />report (see Questionnaire & Toplines on page 31), and a complete set of crosstabulations for the <br />survey results is contained in Appendix A. <br />True North thanks the City of Santa Ana for the opportunity to <br />assist the City in this important effort. The collective expertise, local knowledge, and insight pro- <br />vided by city staff and representatives improved the overall quality of the research presented <br />here. <br />DISCLAIML The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the authors <br />(Dr. Timothy McLarney and Richard Sarles) at True North Research, Inc. and not necessarily those <br />of the City of Santa Ana. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. <br />True North is a full -service survey research firm that is dedicated to <br />providing public agencies with a clear understanding of the values, perceptions, priorities, and <br />concerns of their residents and voters. Through designing and implementing scientific surveys, <br />focus groups, and one-on-one interviews as well as expert interpretation of the findings, True <br />North helps its clients to move with confidence when making strategic decisions in a variety of <br />areas —such as planning, policy evaluation, performance management, establishing fiscal priori- <br />ties, passing revenue measures, and developing effective public information campaigns. <br />During their careers, Dr. McLarney and Mr. Sarles have designed and conducted over 1 ,500 sur- <br />vey research studies for public agencies, including more than 500 revenue measure feasibility <br />studies. Of the measures that have gone to ballot based on Dr. McLarney's recommendation, <br />93% have been successful. In total, the research that Dr. McLarney has conducted has led to over <br />$42 billion in voter -approved local revenue measures. <br />6-0 1�0514gfa Ana 8 fiYIA North Research, Inc.-V _1Y0* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.