My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-04-21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/21/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Agenda Packet_2026-04-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2026 10:38:27 AM
Creation date
4/15/2026 9:18:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
4/21/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
881
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />NEPA/CEQA RE-VALIDATION FORM (rev. 09/2024) <br />DIST-CO-RTE: 12-ORA-Santa Ana <br />PM/PM: N/A <br />EA or Fed-Aid Project No.: CML 5063 (200) <br />Other Project No. (specify): N/A <br />Project Title: Warner Ave. Bike Lane <br />Environmental Approval Type: NEPA CE <br />Date Approved: 12-30-2019 <br />Reason for Consultation (23 CFR 771.129): <br />☒ Project proceeding to next major federal approval <br />☐ Change in scope, setting, effects, mitigation measures, requirements <br />☐ 3-year timeline (EIS only) <br />☐ N/A (Re-Validation for CEQA only) <br />Description of Changed Conditions: There are no changes in scope to the project from the <br />original NEPA CE approval. The Project is proceeding to the next major federal approval, for <br />construction funding <br />NEPA CONCLUSION - VALIDITY <br />Based on an examination of the changed conditions and supporting information: (Check ONE <br />of the three statements below, regarding the validity of the original document/determination (23 <br />CFR 771.129). If document is no longer valid, indicate whether additional public review is <br />warranted and whether the type of environmental document will be elevated. NOTE: If <br />applicable, remember to check conformity status. See the SER Vol. 1, Chapter 11 and contact <br />the District Air Quality Specialist for additional information.) <br />☒ The original environmental document or CE remains valid. No further documentation <br />will be prepared. <br />☐ The original environmental document or CE is in need of updating; further <br />documentation has been prepared and ☐ is included on the continuation sheet(s) or <br />☐ is attached. With this additional documentation, the original ED or CE remains <br />valid. <br />Additional public review is warranted (23 CFR 771.111(h)(3)) ☐ Yes ☐ No <br />☐ The original environmental document or CE is no longer valid. <br />Additional public review is warranted (23 CFR 771.111(h)(3)) ☐ Yes ☐ No <br />Supplemental environmental document is needed. ☐ Yes ☐ No <br />New environmental document is needed. ☐ Yes ☐ No (If “Yes,” specify type: ) <br />CONCURRENCE WITH NEPA CONCLUSION <br />I concur with the NEPA conclusion above. <br />________________________________ _______________ <br />Signature: Environmental Branch Chief Date <br />________________________________ _______________ <br />Signature: Project Manager/DLAE Date <br />5/27/25 <br />05/27/2025 <br />EXHIBIT 4 <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 15 – 139 4/21/2026
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.