My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Approve Adjustments & CIP Amendment, & Agreements with Mark Thomas, So Cal Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), the U.S. Department of Transportation, & Caltrans for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project (No. 26-6718)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
05/05/2026 Regular, HA
>
Item 22 - Approve Adjustments & CIP Amendment, & Agreements with Mark Thomas, So Cal Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), the U.S. Department of Transportation, & Caltrans for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project (No. 26-6718)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 1:39:30 PM
Creation date
4/30/2026 8:07:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Public Works
Item #
22
Date
5/5/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 2 <br /> Santa Ana Blvd.Grade Separation <br /> Table 3 - Intersection LOS <br /> Without Project With Project <br /> Traffic AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak <br /> Intersection Control Hour Hour Hour Hour <br /> ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS <br /> Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.479 A 0.538 A 0.532 A 0.588 A <br /> Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS <br /> c Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 28.1 C 25.7 C 28.1 C 25.7 C <br /> N <br /> Santiago St/Civic Center Dr AWSC 11.4 B 12.3 B 11.6 B 12.4 B <br /> Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 11.2 B 9.7 B n/a2 n/a2 <br /> WSARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.7 A 11.8 B 9.7 A 11.8 B <br /> Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F >50 F >50 F <br /> 1-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 25.5 C 26.4 C 25.6 C 26.4 C <br /> ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS <br /> Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.521 A 0.598 A 0.587 A 0.662 B <br /> N Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS <br /> Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 28.8 C 26.4 C 29.4 C 26.7 C <br /> Santiago St/Civic Center Dr AWSC 12.3 B 13.3 B 12.8 B 13.9 B <br /> = Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 11.6 B 9.8 A n/a2 n/a2 n/a2 n/a2 <br /> Q SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.9 A 12.5 B 10.0 A 12.7 B <br /> O Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F >50 F >50 F <br /> 1-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 26.0 C 26.6 C 26.3 C 26.8 C <br /> ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS <br /> Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.771 C 0.774 C 0.771 C 0.773 C <br /> c Santiago St/Civic Center Dr Signal 0.559 A 0.610 B 0.565 A 0.619 B <br /> N <br /> Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS <br /> w Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 32.1 C 37.8 D 32.1 C 37.8 D <br /> >v Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 12.9 B 10.7 8 n/a2 n/a2 n/a2 n/a2 <br /> a SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.7 A 14.7 B 9.7 A 14.7 B <br /> LL Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F >50 F >50 F <br /> 1-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 31.7 C 30.7 C 31.8 C 30.7 C <br /> Notes: <br /> A WSC-all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC-two-way stop controlled intersection;Delay expressed in terms of seconds <br /> Bold denotes unacceptable LOS <br /> ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Ca/trans facilities.Delay(reported in seconds per vehicle)is reported for all <br /> unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC,the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the <br /> worst approach is calculated. <br /> 5 ALTERNATIVES <br /> The Project Development Team (PDT) explored various alternatives to address the need and <br /> purpose of this project, taking into account the constraints presented by the project area and the <br /> City's desired traffic operations. Both an overhead alternative and an underpass alternative were <br /> discussed among the PDT members. However, the overcrossing alternative was deemed non- <br /> viable because of concerns and opposition expressed by members of an adjacent neighborhood. <br /> A No-Build Alternative was not considered, with the exception of within the traffic studies <br /> PROJECT REPORT EQUIVALENT 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.