My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-05-05
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
05/05/2026 Regular, HA
>
Agenda Packet_2026-05-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2026 9:47:48 AM
Creation date
4/30/2026 2:01:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7t`•� tinfl..ii� .. <br /> COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY <br /> 'rlu 1 vW'tswgve. <br /> About WS <br /> DL9�15-Ounher 91 <br /> Ad—te! <br /> Ed.-- _ 29 First Street Multi Modal Study SURVEY iav Moving <br /> ARi—..l TFaa City&3 :a Mal Firs SI-e K%Ib mdN Bmie—S[udy i,,W Nw,, nd amP Lt. F♦/r yr�rd <br /> rbW Street n wrMca bemcen$dabl Street end Tu In Avenue all modes Nrrerkep«teNan,IrW WIC _ <br /> Eventr! I—,bkye-tans,and pedeslGans with enha—d sates b bU51rv[s .r MdWnA J -.. <br /> Oanale nelghWil—ds,eEaWtlml,atlllile3.ando1ikeydeNnwfomTWsUt InbendstoMN on First <br /> ., <br /> � r <br /> November 2025 <br /> nlGvember 10�6:0e prn-7 30;m gseoar[i,mstreets <br /> 1"0 r <br /> Advocate Subcommittee 3o1n us for the <br /> return OP-- <br /> Are yTu 1--ted In ka N mole abou,W-r-ansp7tatkn In Santa Ana and orange C-nrP' SAAS A©V OIcATE <br /> SUBCOMMITT <br /> EE <br /> JCe+GV monMly MvocaSe SYGGPmanrtCe dnd IGe`mE GRnve53nCn..>Senaa 1pgCs may inLluae❑n5 <br /> Figure 13: The Santa Ana Active Streets website advertised the Study's survey. <br /> Feedback Received <br /> The CWG met virtually three times in addition to the quarterly Stakeholder Group meetings <br /> throughout the Study. In addition to fostering meaningful community participation and <br /> understanding of the Study, the organizations emphasized several common themes during <br /> these meetings: <br /> • That this project should not be seen solely as a bike lane initiative, but as a <br /> multimodal, inclusive effort for people of all ages and travel preferences. <br /> • Emphasized the importance of incorporating community feedback in the design <br /> options to build trust with the community. <br /> • Encouraged that Public Works delivered a comprehensive briefing and work study <br /> session to the City Council prior to a selection of a locally preferred alternative. It was <br /> also noted that, while traffic is undesirable, the corridor is often empty during the day, <br /> when accidents are most likely to occur. <br /> When presented with all options, the CWG was not in favor of the concept that maintained <br /> all six travel lanes. They noted that such a concept would not be in alignment with the <br /> multimodal goals of the project. <br /> City Council 11 5/5/2026 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.