My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2011-03-21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
03/21/2011
>
FULL PACKET_2011-03-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 1:35:45 PM
Creation date
3/23/2011 2:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/21/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
674
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. Agricultural Resources — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant <br />environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site <br />Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in <br />assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Would the project: <br />A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or ❑ ❑ ❑ X <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as <br />shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the <br />California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural <br />use? <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ <br />Williamson Contract? <br />C. Involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could result in <br />conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? <br />75A-44 <br />LE <br />❑ ❑ rQ <br />❑ ❑ <br />Responses to <br />101 Environmental <br />Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Potentially <br />with <br />Less Than <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources ® <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Significant No <br />Impact Impact <br />I. Aesthetics — Would the project: <br />A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />to, trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings <br />within a state highway? <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character <br />or quality of the site and its surroundings? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views <br />in the area? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />II. Agricultural Resources — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant <br />environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site <br />Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in <br />assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Would the project: <br />A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or ❑ ❑ ❑ X <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as <br />shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the <br />California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural <br />use? <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ <br />Williamson Contract? <br />C. Involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could result in <br />conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? <br />75A-44 <br />LE <br />❑ ❑ rQ <br />❑ ❑ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.