My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2011-03-21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
03/21/2011
>
FULL PACKET_2011-03-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 1:35:45 PM
Creation date
3/23/2011 2:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/21/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
674
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br />Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />H. <br />Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />structures which would impede or redirect flood <br />flows? <br />I. <br />Expose people or structures to a significant risk of <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />J� <br />loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including <br />flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. <br />J. <br />Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />IX. Land Use and Planning — Would the project: <br />A. <br />Physically divide an established community? <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />B. <br />Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. <br />Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />X. Mineral <br />Resources — Would the project: <br />A. <br />Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral <br />❑ ❑ ❑j <br />resource that would be of value to the region and <br />the residents of the state? <br />B. <br />Result in the loss of availability of a locally important <br />Mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br />75A -50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.