|
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives
<br />Table 3-2
<br />
<br />Land Use Type Alternative 3 an
<br />
<br />Affemative 3 d Proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A a
<br />Characteristics
<br />Trans# Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 846) ` nd SD 84B)
<br />
<br />Werence
<br />Residential (units) 2,026 4,075 (2,049)
<br />Retail (so 351,000 387,000 (36,000)
<br />Industrial (so (990,000) (990,000) 0
<br />Commercial (so (124,000) (124,000) 0
<br />Civic (so (21,000) (21,000) 0
<br />Green (so 680,000 680,000 0
<br />Parking (1,534,000) (1,772,000) (238,000)
<br />SOURCE: PBS&J 2010
<br />Findings
<br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make
<br />the adoption of Alternative 3 infeasible.
<br />Although Alternative 3 would reduce a significant and unavoidable impact of the proposed project to
<br />aesthetics (shading and shadows) to a less than significant level, it would restrict development within the
<br />City to low- to mid-rise development, which would not meet project objectives to the same extent as the
<br />proposed project.
<br />Specifically, this restriction would require a reduction in housing (including affordable housing) from
<br />4,075 units to 2,026 units, which would not meet Santa Ana's Regional Housing Needs Assessment for
<br />2006-2014, which call for 3,393 units, 1,248 of which must be affordable for low, very low, and extremely
<br />low income households. The City of Santa Ana has a great need for affordable housing - sixty percent of
<br />the households in Santa Ana have low, very low, and extremely low incomes. (City of Santa Ana General
<br />Plan Draft Housing Element, Appendix A, p. A-10.) Goal 2 of the Housing Element is to "provide a
<br />diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's
<br />residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive
<br />community." Alternative 3 would not meet this goal to the same extent as the proposed project.
<br />Similarly, it would not meet Housing Element policy 2.2, set forth below, to the same extent as the
<br />proposed project:
<br />HE-2.2 District Centers. Create high intensity, mixed-use urban villages and 24-hour
<br />pedestrian-oriented experiences that support the mid-to high-rise office centers,
<br />commercial activity, and cultural activities in the varied District Centers.
<br />Alternative 3 would also fail to implement the following Housing Element policies to the same extent as
<br />the proposed project:
<br />HE-2.1 Downtown. Strengthen Santa Ana's core as a vibrant mixed-use and mixed-income
<br />environment by capitalizing on the government center, arts district, and historic
<br />downtown and facilitating transit-oriented development and diverse
<br />neighborhoods.
<br />Revised Station District Project and FOIL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding 3_7
<br />Considerations
<br />8OA-78
|