Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 5 Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />CHAPTER 5 Statement of Overriding <br />Considerations <br />5.1 INTRODUCTION <br />Section 15093 of the CEQA guidelines states: <br />(a) CEQA requires the decision - making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, <br />technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks <br />when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, <br />technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse <br />environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." <br />(b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects <br />which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall <br />state in writing the specific reason to support its actions based on the final EIR and /or other <br />information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by <br />substantial evidence in the record. <br />(c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in <br />the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This <br />statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section <br />15091. <br />This Statement of Overriding Considerations describes the anticipated economic, social, and other <br />benefits or other considerations of the Proposed Project to support the decision to proceed with the <br />project even though not all of the identified impacts are mitigated to a less- than - significant level. <br />5.2 UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS <br />Even with mitigation measures identified in the EIR for the project, the following significant impacts are <br />unavoidable because no feasible mitigation is available to further reduce the impacts to a less -than- <br />significant level. Refer to Chapter 2 (CEQA Findings) for further clarification regarding the impacts <br />listed below. <br />Aesthetics <br />Impact 4.1 -5 Long -term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning <br />Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) would result in a substantial increase in <br />shade /shadows over sensitive uses. <br />Cumulative As noted in the discussion for Impact 4.1 -5, new sources of increased shade <br />would likely result from new development under the proposed Transit Zoning <br />Code (SD 84A and SD 8413). Since there is typically no feasible mitigation <br />available to reduce to less than significant or eliminate shading impacts, significant <br />and unavoidable shading impacts would result from the proposed Transit Zoning <br />Code (SD 84A and SD 8413). Cumulative development of additional medium- and <br />Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding 5 -5 <br />Considerations 8OA -98 <br />