Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />No Substantial <br />New <br />Change from <br />Significant <br />More Severe <br />Previous <br />Issues and Supporting Information Sources <br />Impact <br />Impacts <br />Analysis <br />c) <br />Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, <br />marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with <br />the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, <br />filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? <br />d) <br />Interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or <br />wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife <br />corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. <br />e) <br />Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological <br />resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? <br />fl <br />Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, <br />Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or <br />state habitat conservation plan? <br />V. Cultural Resources —Would the project: <br />a) <br />Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical <br />resource as defined in §15064.5? <br />b) <br />Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique <br />archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? <br />c) <br />Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or <br />site or unique geological feature? <br />d) <br />Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal <br />cemeteries? <br />VI. Geology and Soils —Would the project: <br />a) <br />Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent <br />El <br />El <br />N <br />Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State <br />Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a <br />known fault? <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? <br />iv) Landslides? <br />b) <br />Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />c) <br />Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become <br />unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site <br />landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br />d) <br />Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform <br />Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks to life or property? <br />e) <br />Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or <br />alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available <br />for the disposal of waste water? <br />MacArthur Place South EIR — 2011 Addendum <br />53 <br />