My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-005 CRA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
2010-2012
>
2011
>
2011-005 CRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:20:39 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 11:09:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2011-005 CRA
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives <br />¦ Alternative 6: Rehabilitate 611 N. Minter Street in Place <br />Description <br />This alternative would be identical to the proposed Developer Project, with the exception that the <br />bungalow court located at 611 N. Minter Street would be retained and rehabilitated. Once rehabilitated, <br />the units at 611 N. Minter Street would be offered for rent to very-low and extremely-low income <br />households. Alternative 6 would provide 88 rental units, of which 85 would be available to low, very-low <br />and extremely-low income households, and would provide 32 ownership units, of which six units would <br />be available for sale to households meeting the Orange County criteria for Moderate Income. In total, <br />this Alternative would provide approximately 36 fewer low, very-low and extremely-low income units <br />than the proposed Developer Project. (See EIR Appendix J (updated) [Alternatives Testing: Financial <br />Analysis], Table 1, Alternatives Analysis.) <br />Findings <br />The Agency hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make the adoption of this alternative infeasible. <br />Specifically, as described above, construction of affordable housing units is critical to meeting the City's <br />RHNA for 2006-2014. The location of the 611 N. Minter Street property at the southeast corner of <br />Minter Street and Santa Ana Boulevard serves as one of the primary foundations of both the <br />architectural and engineering design of the largest component of the Developer Project. By eliminating <br />this property from the overall site (identified as Rental Lot 1 on Figure 3-7) it forces a significant <br />redesign of the multi-family development project proposed for this site and results in a significant <br />reduction of units, all of which would be deed-restricted for long-term affordability. <br />Elimination of 36 affordable housing units from the proposed Developer Project inhibits the City's <br />ability to meet its housing requirements. It also inhibits the City's ability to "maximize affordable housing <br />on Agency-owned properties that is of high quality, sustainable, and available to various income levels" <br />(Policy HE-2.8). (See Santa Ana Housing Element (2006-2014).) This alternative also does not go as far <br />to "encourage the construction of rental housing for Santa Ana's residents and workforce, including a <br />commitment to very low, low and moderate income residents and moderate income Santa Ana workers" <br />(Policy HE-2.3) or to "facilitate and encourage a diversity and range in types, prices, and sizes of housing, <br />including single-family homes, apartments, town homes, mixed/multiuse housing, transit-oriented <br />developments, and live/work housing" (Policy HE-2.4). (Id.) <br />In addition to creating infeasibilities due to the reduction in total affordable housing yield, the proposal <br />to rehabilitate the existing units contained within the 611 N. Minter Street bungalow court would not be <br />consistent with the policies contained in the 2006-2014 Housing Element, which identifies the need to <br />create rental units appropriately sized for large families. The existing bungalows at 611 N. Minter Street <br />are currently configured as studio units. The sleeping area is comprised of a "Murphy-style" fold-out bed <br />and the kitchen facilities are minimal. In addition, the property is severely deteriorated. The most likely <br />rehabilitation scenario, which would require the consolidation of existing units, would result in the <br />creation of one one-bedroom unit and six two-bedroom units. This is a much less desirable unit mix than <br />that achieved by the Developer Project. <br />Transit Zoning Code (SD 84) EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 3-13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.