My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-005 CRA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
2010-2012
>
2011
>
2011-005 CRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:20:39 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 11:09:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2011-005 CRA
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives <br />¦ Proposed Mitigation Measure. Revise mitigation measure MM4.6-1 to require future <br />development projects to adhere to "[...] the 4`' term Municipal NPDES Stormwater Permit for <br />the Santa Ana Region of Orange County as adopted on May 11, 2009." (Letter from Orange <br />County Public Works, dated June 3, 2010, comment OCPW-3.) <br />Finding. The Agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other <br />considerations make this mitigation measure infeasible. <br />Rationale. Because the majority of the future development of the Transit Zoning Code may occur <br />years in the future, requiring development projects to comply with "current National Pollutant <br />Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements" ensures compliance with the most up-to- <br />date standards over a long period of time, since the requirements that are in effect today may differ <br />in the future. Writing the mitigation measure in this way places the responsibility of complying <br />with NPDES regulations on future project proponents, regardless of how the regulations change <br />over time. Therefore, the City will adopt mitigation measure MM4.6-1 as set forth in the EIR. <br />Finding Related to Clarifications and Updates to the EIR in Response to Comments <br />Received Since the Planning Commission Hearing on May 27, 2010 <br />Finding. Responses to all written and oral comments on the EIR received since the Planning <br />Commission Hearing on May 27, 2010, merely clarify and amplify the analysis presented in the EIR and <br />do not trigger the need to recirculate per CEQA Guidelines ?15088.5(b). <br />3-22 Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding <br />Considerations
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.