Laserfiche WebLink
CUP No. 2011-14 <br />June 27, 2011 <br />Page 3 <br />Conditional Use Permits are governed by Section 41-638 of the SAMC. Conditional use permits may <br />be granted when it can be shown that the following can be established: <br />• That the proposed use will provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well <br />being of the neighborhood or community. <br />• That the proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to <br />the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. <br />• That the proposed use will not adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic <br />development of properties surrounding the area. <br />• That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for <br />such use. <br />• That the proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan of the city or any specific plan <br />applicable to the area of the proposed use. <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the conditional use permit. Conversely, <br />the inability to make these findings would result in a denial. Using this information staff has prepared <br />the following analysis, which, in turn forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />In analyzing the conditional use permit request, staff believes that the following findings of fact <br />warrant approval of the conditional use permit. <br />Section 41-198.5(b) of the SAMC establishes site selection order of preference criteria for wireless <br />facilities. These provisions require the exploration of various options before proposing a new <br />monopole. The applicant has explored alternatives to this monopine, including providing a roof <br />mounted facility on an existing building in the area and co-locating on another facility. The heights of <br />the buildings (predominantly one story) in the immediate area do not provide the necessary height to <br />provide adequate service. Also, although there is another wireless facility on the subject site, the <br />monopalm is an inferior design for the collocation of another wireless carrier. In fact, the majority of <br />the cellular facilities that have been approved by the City in the past few years have been designed as <br />a monopine, which can easily stealth multiple wireless facilities. <br />Site improvements are proposed for the site that will bring the site into compliance with the wireless <br />communications facility ordinance. First, two 36-inch box Canary Island Pine tree will be planted <br />near the facility to assist in the stealthing of the monopine. Second, decorative wrought iron fencing <br />will be used to secure the wireless facility and ancillary equipment. Third, additional bougainvillea <br />will be planted within the existing planter at the rear of the site, which is adjacent to the proposed <br />wireless facility. Fourth, conditions of approval that require graffiti removal, landscape maintenance <br />and fence repairs have been incorporated into the project. Finally, a new trash enclosure will be <br />installed that complies with the City standards. The remaining items were found to be in compliance <br />with the requirements of the wireless facilities ordinance. <br />31A-5