Laserfiche WebLink
Shouldn't these people be kept away from places where children regularly gather? <br />REMEDIES FOR SEX OFFENDERS WHO WISH TO GO INTO PARKS <br />There are ways to balance protection of children and providing relief to registrants with unusual <br />circumstances. There are three ways a registered sex offender can be granted permission to <br />enter parks. <br />Certificate of rehabilitation <br />Under Penal Code 290.5, which In concert with Penal Code 4852.0'1, certain 290 registrants can <br />apply to a court fora certificate of rehabilitation. Upon a court finding, a registrant may be <br />relieved of the duty to register under section 290. This alleviates the concern that the park <br />ordinance might affect a 290 registrant whose offense was relatively "minor" and claims he no <br />longer poses a threat to society. The court is in a better position to determine if a certain <br />individual no longer poses a threat to the community rather than a legislative body giving a <br />general exemption to a class of offenders without knowing their individual threat assessment. <br />Exemption from law enforcement <br />Second, law enforcement is in a better position to grant permission to enter a park on a case- <br />by-case basis as it has the resources to investigate, and the knowledge and experience to <br />gauge a sex offender's threat assessment. For example, a gardener who works on a <br />maintenance crew at a park every Tuesday from 9 to 10 a. m. could get permission fn?m the <br />city's police chief to be at the park during the specified time. The sex offender need not be a <br />resident of the city and local law enforcement are notified of the presence of a sex offender. <br />More inclusive ordinance <br />Third, the OCDA does not see any rationale to limit the ordinance to those whose offense was <br />against a child victim. <br />If however, Lake Forest wishes to limit the sex offender ordinance, the OCDA feels that more <br />290 registrants should be included than is currently proposed. At a minimum, the ordinance <br />should include: <br />(1) 290 registrants whose offense was a felony; <br />(2) 290 registrants whose offense involved someone under the age of 1 8; <br />(2) 290 registrants who violated the following Penal Code sections, whether a <br />misdemeanor or a felony and regardless of the victim's age: <br />(a) Any section listed in Chapter 7.5 (crimes involving obscene matter, <br />including child pornography); and <br />(b) Sections 207 (kidnapping), 220 (forcible and/or in concert or assault with <br />intent to commit rape, sodomy, oral copulation, lewd acts upon a child or <br />penetration), 26'1 (rape), 264 (rape), 286 (sodomy), 288 (lewd acts upon a <br />child), 288a (oral copulation of a minor), 288.2 (sending harmful material to <br />a minor with sexual intent), 288.3 (contacting a minor to commit forcible <br />kidnapping or kidnapping for ransom, rape, child endangerment, sodomy, <br />lewd acts upon a child, oral copulation of a minor, forcible sexual <br />50A-15