My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2012-09-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
09/04/2012
>
FULL PACKET_2012-09-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2016 1:41:08 PM
Creation date
8/30/2012 4:55:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
9/4/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
782
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CUP No. 2012 -16 & VA No. 2012 -05 <br />August 13, 2012 <br />Page 5 <br />Variance Requests <br />Sender One is proposing to obtain two variances for its new facility: one to increase the height of <br />the building and another to allow signage higher on a building than allowed by code. Variance <br />requests are governed by Section 41 -638 of the SAMC. Variance requests may be granted when it <br />can be shown that the following can be established: <br />• That there exists a special circumstance related to the property, such as size, shape, topography, <br />location or surroundings. <br />• That the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights. <br />• That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding property. <br />• That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variance. Conversely, the inability to <br />make these findings would result in a denial. Using this information, staff has prepared the following <br />analysis, which forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />Variance No. 2012 -05 (a) - Building Height <br />SAMC Section 41 -474 states that no structure shall exceed 35 feet in height in the Light Industrial <br />zoning district. Typical industrial buildings, including ones found on the premises, range in height <br />from 20 to 25 feet, which is sufficient for high pile storage and related equipment associated with <br />manufacturing operations, but not for indoor sports facilities, such as rock climbing. The very <br />nature of the sport of rock climbing requires tall vertical structures on which to practice, simulating <br />the challenging natural environments that these sports enthusiasts prefer. This facility, if <br />approved, is intended to attract all levels of customers, from those just entering the sport, to the <br />serious climber. The facilities currently located in Orange County are limited in their draw due to <br />the relatively small height of the climbing walls, no higher than 28 feet. The industry standard for <br />more advanced rock climbing walls is between 45 and 50 feet in height. If approved, the Sender <br />One facility will be one of only two in the Southern California region offering this wall height, <br />making it a regional draw for this type of facility and a unique contribution to the City's indoor <br />sports facilities. Staff recommends approval of the variance from the maximum building height <br />based on the following facts and findings: <br />• The project site has a special circumstance related to its size, shape and location. The project <br />was constructed in the early 1970's as an industrial center. The buildings in the center were low <br />scale, were intended to accommodate industrial users, and did not anticipate alternate uses, such <br />as indoor sports facilities. At the time that this building was constructed the City's codes did not <br />31A-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.