Laserfiche WebLink
The courts have found that the act of signing a piece of paper declaring that someone is a primary <br />caregiver does not necessarily make that person one. (See People ex rel. Lungren v. Peron (1997) 59 <br />Cal.AppAth 1383, 1390: "One maintaining a source of marijuana supply, from which all members of <br />the public qualified as permitted medicinal users may or may not discretionarily elect to make <br />purchases, does not thereby become the party `who has consistently assumed responsibility for the <br />housing, health, or safety' of that purchaser as section 11362.5(e) requires.") <br />The California Legislature had the opportunity to legalize the existence of dispensaries when setting <br />forth what types of facilities could qualify as "primary caregivers." Those included in the list clearly <br />show the Legislature's intent to restrict the definition to one involving a significant and long-term <br />commitment to the patient's health, safety, and welfare. The only facilities which the Legislature <br />authorized to serve as "primary caregivers" are clinics, health care facilities, residential care <br />facilities, home health agencies, and hospices which actually provide medical care or supportive <br />services to qualified patients. (Cal. H&S Code sec. 11362.7(d)(1).) Any business that cannot prove <br />that its relationship with the patient meets these requirements is not a primary caregiver. <br />Functionally, the business is a drug dealer and is subject to prosecution as such. <br />4. Cooperatives and Collectives <br />According to the California Attorney General's recently issued Guidelines for the Security and Non- <br />Diversion of MarYuana Grown for Medical Use, unless they meet stringent requirements, <br />dispensaries also cannot reasonably claim to be cooperatives or collectives. In passing the Medical <br />Marijuana Program Act, the Legislature sought, in part, to enhance the access of patients and <br />caregivers to medical marijuana through collective, cooperative cultivation programs. (People v. <br />Urziceanu (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 747, 881.) The Act added section 11362.775, which provides <br />that "Patients and caregivers who associate within the State of California in order collectively or <br />cooperatively to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes, shall not solely on the basis of that fact be <br />subject to state criminal sanctions" for the crimes of marijuana possession, possession for sale, <br />transportation, sale, furnishing, cultivation, and maintenance of places for storage, use, or <br />distribution of marijuana. However, there is no authorization for any individual or group to cultivate <br />or distribute marijuana for profit. (Cal. H&S Code sec. 11362.77(a).) If a dispensary is only a <br />storefront distribution operation open to the general public, and there is no indication that it has been <br />involved with growing or cultivating marijuana for the benefit of members as a non-profit enterprise, <br />it will not qualify as a cooperative to exempt it from criminal penalties under California's marijuana <br />laws. <br />Further, the common dictionary definition of "collectives" is that they are organizations jointly <br />managed by those using its facilities or services. Legally recognized cooperatives generally possess <br />"the following features: control and ownership of each member is substantially equal; members are <br />limited to those who will avail themselves of the services furnished by the association; transfer of <br />ownership interests is prohibited or limited; capital investment receives either no return or a limited <br />return; economic benefits pass to the members on a substantially equal basis or on the basis of their <br />patronage of the association; members are not personally liable for obligations of the association in <br />the absence of a direct undertaking or authorization by them; death, bankruptcy, or withdrawal of <br />one or more members does not terminate the association; and [the] services of the association are <br />furnished primarily for the use of the members."20 Marijuana businesses, of any kind, do not <br />normally meet this legal definition. <br />© 2009 California Police Chiefs Assn. 5 All Rights Reserved <br />65A-66