My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
03/18/2013
>
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:28:57 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 4:00:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65A
Date
3/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OTHER ADVERSE SECONDARY IMPACTS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF <br />DISPENSARIES <br />Other adverse secondary impacts from the operation of marijuana dispensaries include street dealers <br />lurking about dispensaries to offer a lower price for marijuana to arriving patrons; marijuana smoking <br />in public and in front of children in the vicinity of dispensaries; loitering and nuisances; acquiring <br />marijuana and/or money by means of robbery of patrons going to or leaving dispensaries; an increase <br />in burglaries at or near dispensaries; a loss of trade for other commercial businesses located near <br />dispensaries; the sale at dispensaries of other illegal drugs besides marijuana; an increase in traffic <br />accidents and driving under the influence arrests in which marijuana is implicated; and the failure of <br />marijuana dispensary operators to report robberies to police. 68 <br />SECONDARY ADVERSE IMPACTS IN THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE <br />A. UNJUSTIFIED AND FICTITIOUS PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS <br />California's legal requirement under California Health and Safety Code section 11362.5 that a <br />physician's recommendation is required for a patient or caregiver to possess medical marijuana has <br />resulted in other undesirable outcomes: wholesale issuance of recommendations by unscrupulous <br />physicians seeking a quick buck, and the proliferation of forged or fictitious physician <br />recommendations. Some doctors link up with a marijuana dispensary and take up temporary residence <br />in a local hotel room where they advertise their appearance in advance, and pass out medical <br />marijuana use recommendations to a line of "patients" at "about $150 a pop."69 Other individuals just <br />make up their own phony doctor recommendations,70 which are seldom, if ever, scrutinized by <br />dispensary employees for authenticity. Undercover DEA agents sportin fake medical marijuana <br />recommendations were readily able to purchase marijuana from a clinic. 1 Far too often, California's <br />medical marijuana law is used as a smokescreen for healthy pot users to get their desired drug, and for <br />proprietors of marijuana dispensaries to make money off them, without suffering any legal <br />repercussions. 72 <br />On March 11, 2009, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California adopted the proposed decision <br />revoking Dr. Alfonso Jimenez's Osteopathic Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate and ordering him <br />to pay $74,323.39 in cost recovery. Dr. Jimenez operated multiple marijuana clinics and advertised <br />his services extensively on the Internet. Based on information obtained from raids on marijuana <br />dispensaries in San Diego, in May of 2006, the San Diego Police Department ran two undercover <br />operations on Dr. Jimenez's clinic in San Diego. In January of 2007, a second undercover operation <br />was conducted by the Laguna Beach Police Department at Dr. Jimenez's clinic in Orange County. <br />Based on the results of the undercover operations, the Osteopathic Medical Board charged Dr. <br />Jimenez with gross negligence and repeated negligent acts in the treatment of undercover operatives <br />posing as patients. After a six-day hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued her decision <br />finding that Dr. Jimenez violated the standard of care by committing gross negligence and repeated <br />negligence in care, treatment, and management of patients when he, among other things, issued <br />medical marijuana recommendations to the undercover agents without conducting adequate medical <br />examinations, failed to gain proper informed consent, and failed to consult with any primary care <br />and/or treating physicians or obtain and review prior medical records before issuing medical <br />marijuana recommendations. The ALJ also found Dr. Jimenez engaged in dishonest behavior by <br />preparing false and/or misleading medical records and disseminating false and misleading <br />advertising to the public, including representing himself as a "Cannabis Specialist" and "Qualified <br />Medical Marijuana Examiner" when no such formal specialty or qualification existed. Absent any <br />© 2009 California Police Chiefs Assn. 11 All Rights Reserved <br />65A-72
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.