My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
03/18/2013
>
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:28:57 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 4:00:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65A
Date
3/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
example, an individual with a physician's recommendation can go to as many marijuana <br />distribution businesses and purchase as much marijuana as he/she wants. <br />California law allows an individual to possess 6 mature or 12 immature plants per qualified <br />person. However, the San Diego Municipal Code states a "caregiver" can only provide care <br />to 4 people, including themselves; this translates to 24 mature or 48 immature plants total. <br />Many of these dispensaries are operating large marijuana grows with far more plants than <br />allowed under law. Several of the dispensaries had indoor marijuana grows inside the <br />businesses, with mature and/or immature marijuana plants over the limits. <br />State law allows a qualified patient or primary caregiver to possess no more than eight <br />ounces of dried marijuana per qualified patient. However, the San Diego Municipal Code <br />allows primary caregivers to possess no more than two pounds of processed marijuana. <br />Under either law, almost every marijuana dispensary had over two pounds of processed <br />marijuana during the execution of the search warrants. <br />Some marijuana dispensaries force customers to sign forms designating the business as their <br />primary caregiver, in an attempt to circumvent the law. <br />2. EXPERIENCES WITH MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY <br />There were some marijuana dispensaries operating in the County of Riverside until the District <br />Attorney's Office took a very aggressive stance in closing them. In Riverside, anyone that is not a <br />"qualified patient" or "primary caregiver" under the Medical Marijuana Program Act who possesses, <br />sells, or transports marijuana is being prosecuted. <br />Several dispensary closures illustrate the impact this position has had on marijuana dispensaries. For <br />instance, the Palm Springs Caregivers dispensary (also known as Palm Springs Safe Access <br />Collective) was searched after a warrant was issued. All materials inside were seized, and it was <br />closed down and remains closed. The California Caregivers Association was located in downtown <br />Riverside. Very shortly after it opened, it was also searched pursuant to a warrant and shut down. <br />The CannaHelp dispensary was located in Palm Desert. It was searched and closed down early in <br />2007. The owner and two managers were then prosecuted for marijuana sales and possession of <br />marijuana for the purpose of sale. However, a judge granted their motion to quash the search <br />warrant and dismissed the charges. The District Attorney's Office then appealed to the Fourth <br />District Court of Appeal. Presently, the Office is waiting for oral arguments to be scheduled. <br />Dispensaries in the county have also been closed by court order. The Healing Nations Collective <br />was located in Corona. The owner lied about the nature of the business in his application for a <br />license. The city pursued and obtained an injunction that required the business to close. The owner <br />appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, which ruled against him. (City of Corona v. Ronald <br />Naulls et al., Case No. E042772.) <br />3. MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY ISSUES IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY <br />CITIES AND IN OTHER BAY AREA COUNTIES <br />Several cities in Contra Costa County, California have addressed this issue by either banning <br />dispensaries, enacting moratoria against them, regulating them, or taking a position that they are <br />simply not a permitted land use because they violate federal law. Richmond, El Cerrito, San Pablo, <br />Hercules, and Concord have adopted permanent ordinances banning the establishment of marijuana <br />dispensaries. Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, Pinole, and Pleasant Hill have imposed moratoria <br />against dispensaries. Clayton, San Ramon, and Walnut Creek have not taken any formal action <br />regarding the establishment of marijuana dispensaries but have indicated that marijuana dispensaries <br />© 2009 California Police Chiefs Assn. 24 All Rights Reserved <br />65A-85
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.